LSCC — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of LSCC's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-05-04 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-11-03
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +11 | −12 | ~25 | 25 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 3 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | +1 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-04
Note: During the first quarter of 2026, we began disaggregating our revenue by Compute and Communications, and Industrial and Embedded. Prior periods have been reclassified to match current period presentation.
Revenue from the Compute and Communications end market increased by 86% for the first quarter of fiscal 2026 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2025 primarily due to stronger demand in data center applications, including general-purpose and AI-specific servers, as well as wireline networking co…
Revenue from the Industrial and Embedded end market increased by 2% for the first quarter of fiscal 2026 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2025 primarily due to recovering end market demand particularly from industrial and aerospace customers.
AI applications are pervasive across our end markets, so we do not consider AI applications as a distinct end market. We expect AI-related revenue to grow over the next few years based on the growing pipeline of AI-related design wins in a diverse set of applications across both of our end market gr…
We have a diverse base of customers where distributors represent a significant portion of our total revenue. Our revenue by geographical market is based on the ship-to location of our customers, which can vary from time to time. For the first quarter of fiscal 2026 compared to the first quarter of f…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-03
We depend in part on stable trade, political, geopolitical, economic, and regulatory environments in the countries where we do business. Increased financial market volatility, inflationary pressure, uncertainty regarding potential increases in tariffs or taxes and impacts from already implemented or…
We are monitoring the rapidly evolving tariff and global trade policies, including tariffs, retaliatory tariffs, and related trade actions announced by the U.S., China, and other countries, and we are working to mitigate potential impacts on our business. The extent and duration of the tariffs and t…
Revenue from the Communications and Computing end market increased by 21% for the third quarter of fiscal 2025 compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2024 and increased by 18% for the first nine months of fiscal 2025 compared to the first nine months of fiscal 2024 primarily due to stronger demand …
Revenue from the Industrial and Automotive end market decreased by 7% for the third quarter of fiscal 2025 compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2024 and decreased by 20% for the first nine months of fiscal 2025 compared to the first nine months of fiscal 2024 primarily due to softer end market de…
While we do not consider AI applications as a distinct end market, we expect AI-related revenue to grow over the next few years based on the growing pipeline of AI-related design wins in a diverse set of applications across all three of our end market segments.
Other information
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-04
On March 5, 2026, Tracy Feanny, Senior Vice President, General Counsel, and Secretary, adopted a Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement intended to satisfy the affirmative defense condition of Rule 10b5-1(c), pursuant to which an estimated aggregate of 24,665 shares of our Common Stock may be sold. The agg…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice