Tickwind
TodayOpportunitiesMarketsAI Chat
EN
Log inSign up
Tickwind

Read every tick. See where the market's blowing.

  • X
  • TelegramChinese
  • Newsletter

Product

  • Markets
  • Theme Zones
  • All stocks
  • Compare
  • Hot stocks
  • Opportunities
  • News
  • Discussion
  • Watchlist
  • What's new

Account

  • Settings
  • Newsletter
  • For writers
  • MCP server
  • Contact
  • Log in
  • Sign up
MarketsTheme ZonesAll stocksCompareHot stocksOpportunitiesNewsDiscussionWatchlistWhat's newSettingsNewsletterFor writersMCP serverContactLog inSign up

© 2026 Tickwind. Not investment advice.

Made for the curious investor.

Home/MCHB/Filing changes

MCHB — what changed in the latest 10-Q

A section-by-section comparison of MCHB's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.

Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-07 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-08

SectionOutcomeAddedRemovedMinorUnchanged
MD&AText added/removed+27−31~3682
Market risk (Item 3)Text added/removed+2−1~213
Controls & proceduresText added/removed00~30
Legal proceedingsNo paragraph-level changes0001
Other informationText added/removed+3−100

Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.

Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Risk factors

Representative excerpts

Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.

MD&A

Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-07

  • Provision (reversal of provision) for credit losses on unfunded lending commitments(1,863)174 (1,689)(631)
  • (2)Return on average tangible equity, efficiency ratio (excluding the impact of intangibles amortization), tangible book value per share, and tangible common equity ratio are non-GAAP financial measures. For a reconciliation of these measures to the comparable GAAP financial measure or the computati…
  • (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)June 30, 2026December 31, 2025
  • (2)Return on average tangible equity, efficiency ratio (excluding the impact of intangibles amortization), tangible book value per share, and tangible common equity ratio are non-GAAP financial measures. For a reconciliation of these measures to the comparable GAAP financial measure or the computati…
  • Second Quarter of 2026 Compared to the First Quarter of 2026

Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-08

  • (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)March 31, 2026December 31, 2025March 31, 2025
  • Provision (reversal of provision) for credit losses on loans (1)
  • Provision (reversal of provision) for credit losses on unfunded lending commitments174 (1,316)94
  • (1)Prior period comparative disclosures for the fourth quarter of 2025 have been adjusted to reflect the impact of adoption of ASU 2025-08.
  • (3)Return on average tangible equity, efficiency ratio (excluding the impact of intangibles amortization), tangible book value per share, and tangible common equity ratio are non-GAAP financial measures. For a reconciliation of these measures to the comparable GAAP financial measure or the computati…

Market risk (Item 3)

Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-07

  • (dollars in thousands)3 Mos. or LessMore Than 3 Mos. to 6 Mos.More Than 6 Mos. to 12 Mos.More Than 12 Mos. to 3 Yrs.More Than 3 Yrs. to 5 Yrs.More Than 5 to 15 Yrs.More Than 15 Yrs.Total
  • Cumulative ratio of interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities55 %63 %78 %134 %168 %103 %108 %

Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-08

  • Cumulative ratio of interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities63 %70 %86 %144 %180 %105 %108 %

Other information

Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-07

  • On June 17, 2026, Tony Kallingal, the Company’s Chief Banking Officer, entered into a “Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” as that term is defined in Regulation S-K, Item 408(a). Mr. Kallingal’s plan is intended to satisfy the affirmative defense of Rule 10b5-1(c) under the Exchange Act. The plan provi…
  • On June 18, 2026, Glenn Shrader, the Company’s General Counsel, entered into a “Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” as that term is defined in Regulation S-K, Item 408(a). Mr. Shrader’s plan is intended to satisfy the affirmative defense of Rule 10b5-1(c) under the Exchange Act. The plan provides for t…
  • Other than as described above, no other of our directors or officers adopted, modified, or terminated a “Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” or “non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement,” as those terms are defined in Regulation S-K, Item 408(a), during the second quarter of 2026.

Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-08

  • During the quarter ended March 31, 2026, none of our directors or officers adopted, modified, or terminated a “Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” or “non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement,” as those terms are defined in Regulation S-K, Item 408(a).

How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q

A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:

  • Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
  • Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
  • Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.

This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.

Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice

More on MCHB

MCHB overviewMCHB quant ratingMCHB fair value (DCF)MCHB vs peersMCHB revenue historyMCHB AI deep research