MEHA — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of MEHA's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-05-15 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-12-15
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +36 | −34 | ~5 | 31 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~3 | 1 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | +3 | −4 | 0 | 0 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 1 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-15
Comparison of the Three Months Ended March 31, 2026, to the Three Months Ended March 31, 2025
Cost of goods sold for the three months ended March 31, 2026 was $684,391 compared to $723,492 for the three months ended March 31, 2025 representing a decrease of approximately 5%. This decrease of $39,101 in cost of goods primarily due to receiving better terms on raw materials.
Gross profit for the three months ended March 31, 2026 was $961,133 compared to 866,764 representing an increase of 11%. This increase of $94,369 was primarily due to the increase in demand from direct to consumer sales channel and better terms on our raw materials.
Sales and marketing expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2026, was $263,707 compared to $178,630 for the three months ended March 31, 2025, representing an increase of approximately 48%. This increase of $85,077 was primarily due to the increase in amazon referral fees and commissions.
General and administrative expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2026 was $1,380,231, compared to $720,234 for the three months ended March 31, 2025, representing an increase of approximately 92%. This increase of $659,997 was primarily attributable to an increase payroll of approximately $2…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-12-15
Comparison of the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2025, to the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2024
Net revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2025, was $5,116,963 compared to $4,886,359 for the nine months ended September 30, 2024, representing an increase of approximately 5%. This increase of $230,604 in net revenue was primarily due to the increase in the demand from our direct to cons…
Cost of goods sold for the three months ended September 30, 2025 was $715,824, compared to $632,194 for the three months ended September 30, 2024, representing an increase of approximately 13%. This increase of $83,630 in cost of goods sold was primarily due to the increase in revenue.
Cost of goods sold for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 was $2,303,752, compared to $2,268,986 for the nine months ended September 30, 2024, representing an increase of approximately 2%. This increase of $34,766 is primarily due to an increase in revenue, as well as tightening of cost contro…
Gross profit as a percentage of net revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2025 was 57.7%, compared to 54.7% for the three months ended September 30, 2024, representing an increase of 3.0%. The increase was primarily due to increase in revenue.
Legal proceedings
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-15
From time to time, we may become involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings which arise in the ordinary course of business. Litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in these or other matters may arise from time to time that may harm our business.
On November 13, 2025, Trailer Park Boys Inc. (“TPB”) commenced a civil claim against the Company and certain other defendants alleging breach of contract. On February 27, 2026, the Company filed a Statement of Defense denying the allegations advanced by TPB. The Company has also filed a Statement of…
On May 25, 2021, True Health Medical Center, S.C. (“True Health”) amended an existing complaint against Kirkman Group, Inc. (“Kirkman”), James Hall and David Humphries to assert claims against HTO Nevada, Inc. and HTO Holdings, Inc. (collectively, HTO Nevada, Inc. and HTO Holdings, Inc. are referred…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-12-15
From time to time, we may be party to litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. As of September 30, 2025, other than those noted below, we are not subject to any material legal proceedings nor, to the best of our knowledge, are any material legal proceedings threatened against us.
On May 25, 2021, True Health Medical Center, S.C. (“True Health”) amended an existing complaint against Kirkman Group, Inc. (“Kirkman”), James Hall and David Humphrey to assert claims against HTO Nevada, Inc. and HTO Holdings, Inc. (collectively, HTO Nevada, Inc. and HTO Holdings, Inc. are referred …
Affiliates of the HTO Parties were first named in the lawsuit on September 23, 2020. The case is pending in the Circuit Court for the Eighteenth Judicial Circuit, DuPage County, Illinois. Kirkman had terminated a royalty agreement prior to selling its assets to the HTO Parties but the royalty agreem…
There is no certain amount at this time in connection with the alleged in the damages claim against the HTO Parties. It is not possible to predict the outcome of this proceeding at this time. True Health has filed a motion for summary judgment that addresses its claims against Kirkman but does not a…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice