Tickwind
TodayOpportunitiesMarketsAI Chat
EN
Log inSign up
Tickwind

Read every tick. See where the market's blowing.

  • X
  • TelegramChinese
  • Newsletter

Product

  • Markets
  • Theme Zones
  • All stocks
  • Compare
  • Hot stocks
  • Opportunities
  • News
  • Discussion
  • Watchlist
  • What's new

Account

  • Settings
  • Newsletter
  • For writers
  • MCP server
  • Contact
  • Log in
  • Sign up
MarketsTheme ZonesAll stocksCompareHot stocksOpportunitiesNewsDiscussionWatchlistWhat's newSettingsNewsletterFor writersMCP serverContactLog inSign up

© 2026 Tickwind. Not investment advice.

Made for the curious investor.

Home/MKTX/Filing changes

MKTX — what changed in the latest 10-Q

A section-by-section comparison of MKTX's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.

Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-07 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-07

SectionOutcomeAddedRemovedMinorUnchanged
MD&AText added/removed+48−21~3264
Market risk (Item 3)Text added/removed00~68
Controls & proceduresText added/removed00~20
Legal proceedingsNo paragraph-level changes0001
Risk factorsNo material changes reported (points to the 10-K)————
Other informationText added/removed00~10

Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.

Representative excerpts

Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.

MD&A

Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-07

  • The 4.2% decrease in our U.S. high-grade volume was principally due to a decrease in our estimated market share. Estimated U.S. high-grade market volume as reported by the FINRA Trade Reporting and Compliance Engine (“TRACE”) increased by 13.2% to $2.8 trillion for the three months ended June 30, 20…
  • Employee compensation and benefits decreased by $3.1 million, primarily due to lower severance costs and bonus accruals.
  • Professional and consulting fees increased by $0.8 million, primarily due to higher legal expenses, partially offset by cost-savings initiatives.
  • Occupancy increased by $0.2 million, primarily due to higher office management and facilities expense.
  • Marketing and advertising expenses increased by $0.5 million, primarily due to an increase in advertising expense and timing of sales-related events.

Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-07

  • The 10.9% increase in our U.S. high-grade volume was principally due to an increase in estimated market volumes partially offset by a decrease in our estimated market share. Estimated U.S. high-grade market volume as reported by the FINRA Trade Reporting and Compliance Engine (“TRACE”) increased by …
  • Employee compensation and benefits increased by $8.3 million primarily due to higher salary and benefit cost and higher severance costs, including repositioning charges related to changes in the Company’s management structure.
  • Marketing and advertising expenses increased by $0.3 million primarily due to higher sales-related travel and entertainment costs.
  • Clearing costs increased by $0.2 million primarily due to higher trading volumes.
  • Our other income (expense) for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, and the resulting dollar and percentage changes, were as follows:

How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q

A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:

  • Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
  • Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
  • Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.

This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.

Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice

More on MKTX

MKTX overviewMKTX quant ratingMKTX fair value (DCF)MKTX vs peersMKTX revenue historyMKTX AI deep research