MOV — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of MOV's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-05-27 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-11-25
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +37 | −58 | ~13 | 10 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | +3 | −3 | ~2 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | +2 | −5 | 0 | 1 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | +1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-27
The United States has imposed, and may in the future impose, additional tariffs and other trade restrictions on imported goods. These measures increase the Company’s product and input costs, disrupt sourcing and logistics, require pricing adjustments that may reduce demand, and adversely affect marg…
Since February 2020, the Company’s U.S. imports of Chinese-origin watch bands and jewelry have been subject to a special incremental tariff of 7.5% under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, and imports of Chinese-origin packaging have been subject to a 25% Section 301 tariff.
In fiscal year 2026, the United States imposed additional “reciprocal” and other tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (“IEEPA”). The Company paid approximately $10.0 million in IEEPA tariffs between February 2025 and February 2026. The Company is evaluating potential recover…
Following the Supreme Court’s decision, the Trump Administration replaced the IEEPA-based tariffs with tariffs imposed under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974. As of the date of this Quarterly Report, Section 122 tariffs impose an incremental 10% ad valorem duty on covered imports. Section 122 ta…
As part of its ongoing efforts to align operating expenses with current business trends, the Company implemented cost-savings initiatives in fiscal year 2025 focused primarily on workforce reductions and certain lease-related actions. In connection with these initiatives, the Company recorded total …
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-25
Since February 2020, the Company’s U.S. imports of Chinese-origin watch bands and jewelry have been subject to a special incremental tariff of 7.5%, and imports of Chinese-origin packaging have been subject to a 25% special tariff. Since March 2025, the United States government has imposed additiona…
In response to the incremental tariffs, the Company has implemented selective wholesale and retail price increases and is developing additional mitigation strategies. These include potential changes to sourcing and operational processes that could result in a change in
country of origin for certain products or otherwise reduce the Company’s exposure to U.S. tariffs. However, the Company expects the tariffs to have a material impact on its U.S. operations even after giving effect to any mitigation efforts, unless these rates are significantly reduced.
During fiscal year 2025, in light of the ongoing challenging consumer-spending environment, the Company committed to a cost-savings initiative to reduce operating expenses through headcount reductions, bringing them more in line with sales. As a result of this initiative, during fiscal year 2025, th…
On July 4, 2025, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (“OBBBA”) was signed into law by President Trump. The OBBBA includes significant provisions, such as the permanent extension of certain expiring provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, modifications to the international tax framework and the restorati…
Market risk (Item 3)
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-27
the Company were to settle its Euro forward contracts at April 30, 2026, the result would be an immaterial gain. As of April 30, 2026, the Company’s British Pound, Chinese Yuan and US Dollar forward contracts had no gain or loss.
The Company considers its exposure to fluctuations in commodity prices to be primarily related to gold used in the manufacturing of the Company’s watches. Under its hedging program, the Company can purchase various commodity derivative instruments, primarily futures contracts. When held, these deriv…
Floating rate debt at April 30, 2026 and 2025 was zero for both periods. During the three months ended April 30, 2026, the Company had no weighted average borrowings. The Company does not hedge these interest rate risks.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-25
comprehensive income until the underlying transaction affects earnings, and then are later reclassified into earnings in the same account as the hedged transaction. The earnings impact is mostly offset by the effects of currency movements on the underlying hedged transactions. To the extent that the…
The Company considers its exposure to fluctuations in commodity prices to be primarily related to gold used in the manufacturing of the Company’s watches. Under its hedging program, the Company can purchase various commodity derivative instruments, primarily futures contracts. When held, these deriv…
Floating rate debt at October 31, 2025 and 2024 was zero for both periods. During the nine months ended October 31, 2025, the Company had no weighted average borrowings. The Company does not hedge these interest rate risks.
Controls & procedures
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-27
The Company, under the supervision and with the participation of its management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, as such terms are defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securitie…
There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the three months ended April 30, 2026, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over …
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-25
The Company, under the supervision and with the participation of its management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, as such terms are defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securitie…
Management is in the process of implementing a remediation plan to address the material weakness, which includes enhancing the Company’s risk assessment and oversight processes to properly assess the risks associated with functional segregation of duties and making changes in personnel and reporting…
During the nine months ended October 31, 2025, management made significant personnel changes in the Dubai branch, including the termination of several employees, among them the former managing director. Management also transitioned certain sales and customer operations roles from regional to functio…
Additional time is required to test the operating effectiveness of these controls and to complete the design, implementation, and testing of other controls needed to remediate the material weakness. The material weakness cannot be considered remediated until the applicable remedial controls operate …
Other than as set forth above, there have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the three months ended October 31, 2025, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the…
Legal proceedings
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-27
On April 28, 2025, the Company received a voluntary request from the Division of Enforcement of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) for documents and information relating to the restatement previously reported in fiscal year 2025. The Company is cooperating with the SEC in responding …
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice