MRAI — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of MRAI's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-13 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-15
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +30 | −17 | ~6 | 18 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~3 | 0 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 2 |
| Risk factors | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 6 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Legal proceedings, Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-13
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Marpai, Inc. and the discussion of the results of our operations in this Quarterly Report, reflect the results of the operations of Marpai for all periods presented. The results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, as applicab…
Comparison of the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 and 2025
Cost of revenue (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below) 6,408 7,395 (987 ) (13.3 )%
During the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, our total revenue was $4.2 million and $4.7 million, respectively, representing a decrease in revenue of $490 thousand. The decline is primarily due to customer turnover. The market is evolving, and we are adapting our approach to better serve ou…
During the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, our total revenue was $8.6 million and $10.1 million, respectively, representing a decrease in revenue of $1.5 million. The decline is primarily due to customer turnover. The market is evolving, and we are adapting our approach to better serve our …
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-15
Based on our current financial condition, our Board of Directors (the “Board”), supported by our management team, is considering exploring strategic alternatives focused on maximizing shareholder value. Strategic alternatives may include, among others, a strategic investment financing which would al…
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Marpai, Inc and the discussion of the results of our operations in this Quarterly Report, reflect the results of the operations of Marpai for all periods presented. The results for the three months ended March 31, 2026, as applicable, are …
Comparison of the Three Months Ended March 31, 2026 and 2025
During the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, our total revenue was $4.4 million and $5.4 million, respectively, representing a decrease in revenue of $974 thousand. The decline is primarily due to customer turnover. The market is evolving, and we are adapting our approach to better serve o…
We incurred $1.2 million of information technology expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2026, compared to $1.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025, representing a decrease of $233 thousand. The decrease is due to the actions taken throughout 2025 and 2026 to streamline the Com…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice