MSB — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of MSB's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-06-12 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-12-12
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Controls & procedures | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
| Risk factors | Some risk factors updated | +4 | −2 | ~1 | 0 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): MD&A, Market risk (Item 3)
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
Risk factors
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-06-12
The limited arms’-length third-party sales of iron ore products (processed at Northshore using Mesabi Trust iron ore) by Cliffs at prices below the annual adjusted bonus royalty threshold price eliminated a bonus royalty during the Trust’s fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2026, could continue to reduc…
Mesabi Trust recognizes bonus royalties on a quarterly basis, based on the volume of shipments for each fiscal quarter at the actual royalty percentage for those shipments and based on the prices for iron ore products sold by Cliffs in bona-fide third-party transactions. The Trust is paid royalty bo…
As recently reported by the Trust in its Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 4, 2026, based on Cliffs’ most recent quarterly royalty report of shipments to an unaffiliated third party customer for the three months ended March 31, 2026, the Trust was credited with a bonus royalty in the amount of $0…
The Trustees are unable to project whether Cliffs will continue to sell iron ore products at prices above, at or below the applicable adjusted bonus royalty threshold price, making it uncertain as to whether the Trust will be paid any future bonus royalty payments. Limited third-party customer sale …
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-12-12
Limited bona fide third-party sales transactions of iron ore products (processed at Northshore using Mesabi Trust iron ore) by Cliffs at prices below the annual bonus royalty threshold price could reduce or even eliminate bonus royalties historically paid to the Trust.
Since 2005, the Trust has consistently been paid bonus royalties by the mine operator pursuant to the Royalty Agreement. The Trust recognizes bonus royalties on a quarterly basis, based on the volume of shipments for each fiscal quarter at the actual royalty percentage for those shipments and based …
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice