NBBK — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of NBBK's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-05-08 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-11-07
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +46 | −62 | ~22 | 36 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | +1 | −1 | 0 | 0 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 0 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-08
Net tax benefit associated with pre-tax non-GAAP adjustments to net income
Deposits. Deposits increased $243.5 million, or 4.2%, to $6.10 billion as of March 31, 2026 from $5.85 billion as of December 31, 2025. Core deposits (which we define as all deposits including certificates of deposit, other than brokered deposits) increased $209.1 million, or 3.9%, to $5.53 billion …
The Company had $455.6 million and $453.0 million in deposits from the cannabis industry, representing 7.5% and 7.7% of total deposits, as of March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively.
Shareholders’ Equity. Total shareholders’ equity decreased $16.2 million, or 1.9%, to $842.8 million as of March 31, 2026 from $858.9 million as of December 31, 2025, primarily as a result of the repurchase of 1,288,509 shares of common stock at an all-in weighted average cost of $21.55 per share to…
Comparison of Operating Results for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2026 and March 31, 2025
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-07
In addition, these forward-looking statements are subject to assumptions with respect to future business strategies and decisions that are subject to change.
●failure to consummate or a delay in consummating the pending acquisition of Provident Bancorp, Inc. and BankProv, including as a result of any failure to satisfy any of the conditions to the proposed transaction on a timely basis or at all;
●risks related to the Company’s pending acquisition of Provident Bancorp, Inc. and BankProv and acquisitions generally, including disruptions to current plans and operations; difficulties in customer and employee retention; fees, expenses and charges related to these transactions being significantly…
Income tax expense on solar tax credit investment basis reduction
Income tax expense on solar tax credit investment basis reduction
Market risk (Item 3)
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-08
The information called for by this Item is incorporated by reference to the discussion of market risk in Item 2 - “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Management of Market Rate Risk.”
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-07
Not applicable, as the Registrant is an emerging growth company.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice