NEN — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of NEN's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-07 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-08
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +20 | −9 | ~21 | 45 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 2 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 1 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-07
Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2025
Rental income for the six months ended June 30, 2026 was approximately $48,140,000, compared to approximately $41,534,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2025, an increase of approximately $6,606,000 (15.9%). Excluding net rental income from the Hill Estates, two sold commercial properties, and Mi…
Operating expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2026 were approximately $43,028,000 compared to approximately $28.632,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2025, an increase of approximately $14,396,000 (50.3%), Excluding operating costs for the Hill Estates, two sold commercial properties, and…
Interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2026 was approximately $11,444,000 compared to approximately $7,928,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2025, an increase of approximately $3,516,000 (44.4%). The increase was due to the interest expense incurred when the Partnership borrowed an a…
Estates, the additional loan for Hill Estates of approximately $68,000,000, and the newly constructed property at Mill Street Heights of approximately $17,500,000.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-08
The Partnership’s principal source of cash during the first three months of 2026 and 2025 was the collection of rents. The Partnership’s principal use of cash during the first three months of 2026 was improvements to rental properties, mortgage principal payments, and distributions to partners.
The majority of cash and cash equivalents of $25,559,751 at March 31, 2026 and $26,668,978 at December 31, 2025 was held in interest bearing accounts at creditworthy financial institutions.
The decrease in cash of $1,109,227 for the three months ended March 31, 2026 is summarized as follows:
During 2026, the Partnership and its Subsidiary Partnerships have completed improvements to certain of the Properties at a total cost of approximately $3,823,000. These improvements were funded from cash reserves. Cash reserves have been adequate to fully fund improvements. The most significant impr…
During the three months ended March 31, 2026, the Partnership received distributions of approximately $345,000 from the investment properties. For the three months ended March 31, 2025, the Partnership received $482,000 in distributions from the investment properties. Included in these net distribut…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice