NEXMvs its industry peers
A metric-by-metric comparison of NEXM against SIC 1000 — valuation, growth, profitability, quality and total return, with each figure's rank within the peer group. Every value is Go-computed from SEC filings and delayed prices; ranks are sorted positions within the group only — descriptive, not advice.
| Company | Market cap | P/E (TTM) | P/B | P/S | Revenue growth (YoY) | Earnings growth (YoY) | EBIT margin | ROE | ROIC | Piotroski F | 1y total return | Dividend yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NEXMThis | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| LTUM | — | — | — | — | — | 48.6%#4 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| LZM | $341M#2 | — | 4.6x#2 | 322.8x#2 | 652.2%#1 | 70.6%#2 | -1742.2%#4 | -18.5%#2 | — | — | — | — |
| LZM.WT | — | — | — | — | 652.2%#1 | 70.6%#2 | -1742.2%#4 | -18.5%#2 | — | — | — | — |
| MAGE | — | — | — | — | -73.8%#5 | 43.9%#5 | -866.3%#3 | — | — | — | — | — |
| MINR | — | — | — | — | 28.8%#3 | -31.8%#7 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| RBTK | — | — | — | — | — | 125.9%#1 | -14.8%#2 | — | — | — | — | — |
| RIO | $104.5B#1 | — | 1.7x#1 | 1.8x#1 | 5.6%#4 | -13.7%#6 | 26.1%#1 | 16.0%#1 | — | — | — | 5.9%#1 |
Peer set: US filers sharing this company's SEC industry classification (SIC 1000). SIC is coarse — conglomerates and multi-segment companies map imperfectly. Values from SEC filings + delayed prices; ranks are within-group positions only. Market cap, P/E, P/B, P/S, 1y total return and dividend yield are computed from each member's latest snapshot price when the table is built (see as-of; snapshot prices can lag) — not live. Some peers are still being computed, so this table covers part of the group and ranks are within the rows shown; it fills in shortly. This table timed out mid-build, so it covers part of the group; ranks are within the rows shown and it fills in shortly. Table built 2026-11-06.
Source: SEC XBRL filings + delayed prices · ranks are within-group positions · For reference only · Not investment advice