NEXT — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of NEXT's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-10-29 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-07-30
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +47 | −30 | ~20 | 57 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 1 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Legal proceedings
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-10-29
•During the second quarter of 2026, we safely energized our main substation with 138kV power in May, and we seconded over 100 operational employees to Bechtel in June as part of preparations for first LNG production.
•During the third quarter of 2026, construction of Phase 1 at the Rio Grande LNG Facility continued to progress safely, on budget, and ahead of schedule, with Train 1 electrical, mechanical, and utility commissioning scopes progressing and installation of the Train 2 main cryogenic heat exchanger co…
•We expect first LNG production from Train 1 at the Rio Grande LNG Facility in the second quarter of 2027 and substantial completion of Train 1 in the third quarter of 2027, which is a quarter ahead of the guaranteed completion schedule under the EPC contract with Bechtel.
•In July 2026, FERC issued its schedule of environmental review for Train 6 at the Rio Grande LNG Facility, and the final Environmental Impact Statement is expected in June 2027.
•In September 2026, we received permit authorization from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (“USACE”) for Train 6, completing a key regulatory authorization required for construction.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-07-30
•We safely energized our main substation with 138kV power in May, and we seconded over 100 operational employees to Bechtel in June as part of preparations for first LNG production. We continue to expect first gas into the Rio Grande LNG Facility in the second half of 2026 and first LNG production f…
◦In early 2026, we began the marketing of early cargoes that we expect to produce prior to the commencement of our long-term LNG Sale and Purchase Agreements (“SPAs”). In February 2026, we entered into LNG sales agreements for the sale of over 175 TBtu of LNG on a free-on-board (“FOB”) basis, with f…
◦In April 2026, Rio Grande LNG Train 5, LLC issued a second installment of $100.0 million and in July 2026 issued a third installment of $100.0 million of 6.56% Senior Secured Notes due in 2050, pursuant to the Note Purchase Agreement entered into in conjunction with the positive final investment de…
We are constructing and developing the Rio Grande LNG Facility on the north shore of the Brownsville Ship Channel in south Texas. The site is located on approximately 1,000 acres of land, which has been leased long-term and includes 15,000 feet of frontage on the Brownsville Ship Channel. We believe…
Construction commenced on Phase 1 at the Rio Grande LNG Facility in July 2023, on Train 4 in September 2025, and on Train 5 in October 2025, in each case following a positive final investment decision (“FID”) and the closing of project financing by the Company’s subsidiaries. Construction will be co…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice