NIOIFvs its industry peers
A metric-by-metric comparison of NIOIF against SIC 3711 — valuation, growth, profitability, quality and total return, with each figure's rank within the peer group. Every value is Go-computed from SEC filings and delayed prices; ranks are sorted positions within the group only — descriptive, not advice.
| Company | Market cap | P/E (TTM) | P/B | P/S | Revenue growth (YoY) | Earnings growth (YoY) | EBIT margin | ROE | ROIC | Piotroski F | 1y total return | Dividend yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NIOIFThis | — | — | — | — | 38.9%#1 | 30.4%#3 | -16.0%#3 | -359.2%#3 | -226.3%#3 | — | — | — |
| LAAOF | — | — | — | — | -18.8%#3 | -117.0%#5 | -0.5%#1 | -0.5%#1 | -1.8%#1 | — | — | — |
| LI | $27.7B#1 | 170.5x#1 | 2.7x#1 | 1.7x#4 | -18.8%#3 | -117.0%#5 | -0.5%#1 | -0.5%#1 | -1.8%#1 | — | — | — |
| LOT | $528M#3 | — | — | 1.0x#3 | -43.8%#5 | 58.0%#1 | -81.5%#5 | — | — | 4#1 | — | 0.4%#2 |
| LOTWW | $32M#4 | — | — | 0.1x#1 | -43.8%#5 | 58.0%#1 | -81.5%#5 | — | — | 4#1 | — | 5.8%#1 |
| NIO | $12.1B#2 | — | 20.4x#2 | 1.0x#2 | 38.9%#1 | 30.4%#3 | -16.0%#3 | -359.2%#3 | -226.3%#3 | — | — | — |
Peer set: US filers sharing this company's SEC industry classification (SIC 3711). SIC is coarse — conglomerates and multi-segment companies map imperfectly. Values from SEC filings + delayed prices; ranks are within-group positions only. Market cap, P/E, P/B, P/S, 1y total return and dividend yield are computed from each member's latest snapshot price when the table is built (see as-of; snapshot prices can lag) — not live. Some peers are still being computed, so this table covers part of the group and ranks are within the rows shown; it fills in shortly. This table timed out mid-build, so it covers part of the group; ranks are within the rows shown and it fills in shortly. Table built 2026-08-03.
Source: SEC XBRL filings + delayed prices · ranks are within-group positions · For reference only · Not investment advice