NP — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of NP's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-10-22 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-07-27
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +78 | −70 | ~52 | 52 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 2 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~3 | 2 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | +2 | −3 | 0 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-10-22
Additionally, periodic lapses or uncertainties in the NFIP’s federal authorization could boost demand for private flood insurance. For example, for 43 days beginning on October 1, 2025, the U.S. federal government experienced a lapse in appropriations. During a shutdown, the NFIP is not authorized t…
We also face competition from other private insurers and MGAs in the flood market. Increased competition in the private flood insurance market could put pressure on, and require us to increase, the commission rates we pay to agents that distribute our products or require higher marketing spend in or…
We rely on our capacity providers to provide insurance capacity and to assume the associated balance sheet insurance risk of the flood insurance policies we sell to policyholders. While higher claims frequency or severity bears no direct risk to our financial results, because we do not bear the insu…
Regulatory changes at the federal and state levels, including those affecting floodplain mapping, risk assessment standards, and lender requirements, could also impact private insurers like Neptune. For example, changes to FEMA’s flood zone designations or its risk rating methodologies could affect …
Employee compensation and benefits consist of salaries, benefits, bonuses, and payroll taxes for our employees. This category also includes share-based compensation, which we present separately in the tables below. Employer payroll taxes on equity awards are included in employee compensation and ben…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-07-27
Additionally, periodic lapses or uncertainties in the NFIP’s federal authorization could boost demand for private flood insurance. For example, for 43 days beginning on October 1, 2025, the U.S. federal government experienced a lapse
in appropriations. During a shutdown, the NFIP is not authorized to issue new policies or renew existing policies until reauthorization by Congress, leaving the private flood insurance market as the sole source for new flood insurance policies. However, concurrently with the start of the shutdown, t…
Further, we also face competition from other private insurers and MGAs in the flood market. Increased competition in the private flood insurance market could put pressure on, and require us to increase, the commission rates we pay to agents that distribute our products or require higher marketing sp…
We rely on our capacity providers to provide insurance capacity and to assume the associated balance sheet insurance risk of the flood insurance policies we sell to policyholders. While higher claims frequency or severity bears no direct risk to our financial results, because we do not bear the insu…
Regulatory changes at the federal and state levels, including those affecting floodplain mapping, risk assessment standards, and lender requirements, could also impact private insurers like Neptune. For example, changes to FEMA’s
Other information
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-10-22
Except as set forth below, during the three months ended September 30, 2026, none of our directors or officers (as defined in Section 16 of the Exchange Act) adopted, modified, or terminated a “Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” or a “non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” as such terms are defined unde…
The number of shares that will be available for sale under the September 13, 2026, plan is not yet determinable because shares issuable upon the December 31, 2026, vesting will be withheld by the Company to satisfy the associated tax withholding obligations before any sale under the plan. As such, t…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-07-27
Except as set forth below, during the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, none of our directors or officers (as defined in Section 16 of the Exchange Act) adopted, modified, or terminated a “Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” or a “non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” as such terms are defined u…
The aggregate number of shares that will be available for sale under this 10b5-1 plan is not yet determinable because an unknown number of shares issuable upon settlement of such RSUs will be forfeited to the Company for
purposes of satisfying the associated tax withholding obligation prior to any sale occurring under the terms of the plan. As such, for purposes of this disclosure, the number of shares referenced above reflects the aggregate maximum number of shares underlying Mr. Duffy’s RSUs without excluding the …
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice