NSPR — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of NSPR's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-14 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-07
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +26 | −13 | ~14 | 40 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~3 | 1 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | Some risk factors updated | +14 | 0 | ~6 | 30 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Market risk (Item 3)
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-14
Our second product, the CGuard Prime Carotid Stent System (“CGuard Prime”), uses the same stent and MicroNet mesh as the CGuard EPS with a differentiated deployment mechanism. CGuard Prime received premarket approval (“PMA”) by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) on June 23, 2025. In May 2…
In May 2026, we announced a voluntary recall in the U.S. of CGuard Prime, initiated in consultation with the FDA. The Company acted after determining during a controlled launch that the technical success rate of the delivery system during CAS procedures had not met performance expectations. The volu…
Subsequent to June 30, 2026, we commenced implementation of a workforce reduction as part of a broader initiative to reduce our operating expenses, improve operational efficiency and better align our resources with our strategic priorities. The workforce reduction is expected to reduce the number of…
We expect to incur aggregate restructuring charges of approximately $0.9 million to $1.2 million, consisting primarily of employee severance and related employee termination costs. Because the workforce reduction was initiated after June 30, 2026, no liability associated with these actions was recor…
We expect the workforce reduction to be substantially completed by the end of the third quarter of 2026. Actual costs incurred may differ from current estimates. We expect these actions to better align our resources with key product development, regulatory, clinical and commercialization priorities …
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-07
Our second product, the CGuard Prime Carotid Stent System (“CGuard Prime”), uses the same stent and MicroNet mesh as the CGuard EPS with a differentiated deployment mechanism. CGuard Prime received premarket approval (“PMA”) by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) on June 23, 2025, and is m…
In May 2026, we announced a voluntary recall in the U.S. of CGuard Prime, initiated in consultation with the FDA. The Company acted after determining during a controlled launch that the technical success of the delivery system during CAS procedures had not met performance expectations. The voluntary…
We were organized in the State of Delaware on February 29, 2008. In October 2024, we established our global headquarters in Miami, Florida to support the U.S. launch and commercialization of CGuard Prime.
A critical accounting policy is one that is both important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operation and requires management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently u…
Revenues. For the three months ended March 31, 2026, revenue was $3,398,000, an increase of $1,869,000, or 122 %, compared to $1,529,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2025. Growth in the quarter was driven mainly by the commercial launch of direct sales of the CGuard Prime product in the U…
Risk factors
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-14
If we fail to comply with the continued listing requirements of the Nasdaq Capital Market, our common stock may be delisted and the price of our common stock and our ability to access the capital markets could be negatively impacted.
Nasdaq has established certain standards for the continued listing of a security on the Nasdaq Capital Market. The standards for continued listing include, among other things, that the minimum bid price for the listed securities not fall below $1.00 per share for a period of 30 consecutive trading d…
On July 17, 2026, we received a notification letter, or the Notification Letter, from the Nasdaq Listing Qualifications notifying us that we are not in compliance with the minimum bid price requirements set forth in Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(a)(2), or the Rule, for continued listing on The Nasdaq Cap…
No assurance can be given that we will be able to regain compliance with the Rule. Failure to meet applicable Nasdaq continued listing standards could result in a delisting of our common stock. A delisting of our common stock from Nasdaq could materially reduce the liquidity of our common stock and …
Our restructuring and the associated workforce reduction may not result in anticipated savings, could result in total costs and expenses that are greater than expected and could disrupt our business.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice