NVCR — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of NVCR's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-07-23 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-04-30
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +26 | −25 | ~19 | 28 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 0 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | +1 | −3 | 0 | 2 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-07-23
concomitant with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel in accordance with guideline recommendations. We have submitted the regulatory application required to market Optune Pax in Japan.
In June, we announced topline results from the Phase 3 TRIDENT trial ("TRIDENT"), evaluating the initiation of TTFields therapy at the start of chemoradiation ("Early Start Arm") compared to initiation of TTFields therapy during the maintenance phase of treatment ("Maintenance Start Arm"), following…
In June, we announced that we received a CE certificate to market Optune Pax for the first-line treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer of exocrine origin, concomitant with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel (gem/nab-pac) in accordance with guideline recommendations. The CE Mark is supported by …
We believe the physical mechanisms of action behind TTFields therapy may be broadly applicable to solid tumor cancers. We have several ongoing clinical trials which further explore the use of TTFields therapy in these solid tumor cancers, including our Phase 3 KEYNOTE D58 trial in GBM, which we expe…
We are exploring options to modify our LUNAR-2 trial design with the goals of compressing the timeline to completion and significantly reducing costs. We anticipate engaging with regulators in the coming months regarding potential protocol revisions to streamline the trial’s primary endpoints with t…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-04-30
We believe the physical mechanisms of action behind TTFields therapy may be broadly applicable to solid tumor cancers. We have several ongoing clinical trials which further explore the use of TTFields therapy in these solid tumor cancers, including the Phase 3 TRIDENT and KEYNOTE D58 trials in GBM a…
The table below presents the current status of the ongoing clinical trials in our pipeline and anticipated timing of data.
We are exploring options to modify our LUNAR-2 trial design with the goals of compressing the timeline to completion and significantly reducing costs. We anticipate engaging with regulators regarding potential protocol revisions in the coming months.
therapy in multiple solid tumor cancer indications. For additional information, see Note 13 to the Annual Consolidated Financial Statements.
We view our operations and manage our business in one operating segment. For the three months ended March 31, 2026, our net revenues were $174.1 million. Our net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2026 was $71.1 million. As of March 31, 2026, we had an accumulated deficit of $1,361.5 million.
Other information
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-07-23
During the three-month period ending June 30, 2026, neither we nor any of our executive officers or directors adopted or terminated any contract, instruction or written plan for the purchase or sale of our securities that are intended to satisfy the affirmative defense conditions of Rule 10b5–1(c) p…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-04-30
The following table describes contracts, instructions or written plans for the purchase or sale of our securities that are intended to satisfy the affirmative defense conditions of Rule 10b5–1(c) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (each a "Rule 10b5-1 Plan") adopted by…
Date of AdoptionDuration of Rule 10b5-1 PlanAggregate Number of Securities to be Purchased Pursuant to the Rule 10b5-1 PlanAggregate Number of Securities to be Sold Pursuant to the Rule 10b5-1 Plan
During the three-month period ending March 31, 2026, none of our other executive officers or directors terminated a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan or adopted or terminated a non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement (as defined in Item 408(c) of Regulation S-K).
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice