OFRM — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of OFRM's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-06 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-07
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +30 | −19 | ~35 | 47 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | +2 | −1 | ~2 | 6 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Legal proceedings, Risk factors, Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-06
Uncertainty in the macroeconomic environment resulting from geopolitical and economic instability, including the imposition of tariffs, embargoes, or similar restrictions could cause disruption in our supply chain. For example, in 2025, the U.S. presidential administration announced the imposition o…
Following the February 2026 ruling, and effective on April 20, 2026, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection launched a platform for importers of record to begin submitting IEEPA tariff refund requests. The imposition of new tariffs (or uncertainty regarding the timing and amount of any tariff refund…
For the three months ended June 30, 2026, net sales increased $25.4 million, or 42%, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2025, primarily due to an increase in volume growth of more than 40%, driven by both the incremental distribution of existing products and the introduction of new products…
For the six months ended June 30, 2026, net sales increased $47.5 million, or 43%, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025, primarily due to an increase in volume growth of more than 31%, driven by both the incremental distribution of existing products and the introduction of new products int…
For the three months ended June 30, 2026, cost of goods sold increased $19.2 million, or 54%, compared to three months ended June 30, 2025, primarily due to increased sales volume. Cost of goods sold as a percentage of net sales increased by 5% primarily due to increased trade spending for promotion…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-07
Uncertainty in the macroeconomic environment resulting from geopolitical and economic instability, including the imposition of tariffs, embargoes, or similar restrictions could cause disruption in our supply chain. For example, in
2025, the U.S. presidential administration announced the imposition of tariffs on numerous countries that trade with the United States, and in February 2026 the United States Supreme Court issued a ruling striking down certain tariffs previously imposed under the International Emergency Economic Pow…
The increase in net sales of $22.1 million, or 44%, was primarily due to an increase in volume growth of more than 21%, driven by both the incremental distribution of existing products and the introduction of new products into our portfolio. The increase in net sales was also driven by a more favora…
The increase in cost of goods sold of $11.5 million, or 37%, was primarily due to increased sales volume. Cost of goods sold as a percentage of net sales decreased by 3% primarily driven by decreased trade spending as a percentage of net sales, which is recognized as a reduction of net sales, primar…
The increase in gross profit by $10.6 million, or 55% was driven by higher net sales generated during the three months ended March 31, 2026. The increase in gross margin by 3% for the three months ended March 31, 2026, compared to the three months ended March 31, 2025 was primarily driven by decreas…
Market risk (Item 3)
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-06
A hypothetical 10% increase or decrease in the weighted-average cost of these commodities and raw materials would have resulted in an increase or decrease to cost of goods sold of approximately $2.0 million and $3.5 million for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2026. We seek to mitigate the impact of raw materials cost increases by negotiating pricing agreements and by a combination of cost savings initiatives and efficiencies and price increases to our customers.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-07
A hypothetical 10% increase or decrease in the weighted-average cost of these commodities and raw materials would have resulted in an increase or decrease to cost of goods sold of approximately $1.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026. We seek to mitigate the impact of raw materials co…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice