OKLO — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of OKLO's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-05-12 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-11-12
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +55 | −66 | ~15 | 14 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | +2 | −1 | 0 | 0 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | +2 | −10 | 0 | 1 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | −1 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-12
The fast fission reactor technology we are commercializing was demonstrated by the Experimental Breeder Reactor-II (“EBR-II”), a fast fission plant that was operated by the U.S. government for 30 years. Our powerhouse product line, called the “Aurora,” builds on this legacy of proven and demonstrate…
We have achieved several significant deployment and regulatory milestones for our first Aurora powerhouse. Notably, we secured a site use permit from the U.S. Department of Energy (“DOE”) for the Idaho National Laboratory (“INL”) site and received a fuel award of five metric tons of HALEU produced f…
We have been tentatively selected to provide electricity and heat to Eielson Air Force Base outside of Fairbanks, Alaska. Our robust pipeline of potential customer engagements spans a number of industries. For example, we have signed non-binding letters of intent with Equinix, Inc. ("Equinix"), Diam…
On January 5, 2026, we entered into a prepayment agreement (the "Prepayment Agreement") with Meta Platforms, Inc. ("Meta") that advances plans to develop a 1.2 gigawatt power campus in Pike County, Ohio, to support Meta’s data centers. The Prepayment Agreement provides a mechanism for Meta to prepay…
We are exploring opportunities with the Tennessee Valley Authority (“TVA”) to recycle the utility’s used fuel at a new facility and to evaluate potential power sales from future Oklo powerhouses in the region to TVA. The market interest in our solutions exemplifies the potential demand for the size …
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-12
We are developing next-generation fast fission power plants called “powerhouses.” In our differentiated build, own, and operate business model, we plan to sell power in the forms of electricity and heat directly to customers, which we believe can allow for fast-tracked customer adoption. In addition…
The fast fission reactor technology we are commercializing was demonstrated by the EBR-II, a fast fission plant that was operated by the U.S. government for 30 years. Our powerhouse product line, called the “Aurora,” builds on this legacy of proven and demonstrated technology. Our Aurora powerhouse …
We have achieved several significant deployment and regulatory milestones for our first Aurora powerhouse. Notably, we secured a site use permit from the DOE for the INL site and received a fuel award of five metric tons of HALEU produced from recovered uranium from previously irradiated EBR-II fuel…
On September 25, 2024, we announced the finalization of a Memorandum of Agreement (“MOA”) with the DOE Idaho Operations Office. This MOA grants us access to conduct site investigations at the identified preferred site in Idaho, marking a key step toward the next phase of site preparation and constru…
In July 2025, we also completed a Phase I pre-application readiness assessment with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (“NRC”) in support of our planned Combined License (“COL”) application under 10 CFR Part 52. The assessment reviewed the maturity of our siting and environmental approach and ou…
Market risk (Item 3)
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-12
We have exposure from changes in interest rates related to our cash equivalents and our investment portfolio, which consists primarily of money market funds, U.S. Treasury securities and commercial paper. As of March 31, 2026, the total carrying value of these interest rate-sensitive assets was $2,5…
We hold non-marketable equity investments in privately held companies with a total carrying value of $17.1 million as of March 31, 2026. Our non-marketable equity investments in privately owned companies not accounted for under the equity method are adjusted to fair value for observable transactions…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-12
Not applicable to a “smaller reporting company” as defined in Item 10(f)(1) of SEC Regulation S-K.
Controls & procedures
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-12
Our management, with the participation and supervision of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executi…
In connection with our continued monitoring and maintenance of our control procedures as part of the implementation of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended, we continue to review, test, and improve the effectiveness of our internal controls. There have not been any changes in ou…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-12
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining a system of disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) that is designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Excha…
In accordance with Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15, an evaluation was completed under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and …
As disclosed in Item 9A, “Controls and Procedures” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, which was filed with the SEC on March 24, 2025, a material weakness related to infrequent and complex transactions was identified as of December 31, 2024.
After giving full consideration to this material weakness, and the additional analyses and other procedures we performed to ensure that our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q were prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP, our management …
financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, our financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods disclosed in conformity with U.S. GAAP.
Other information
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-12
On September 22, 2025, R. Craig Bealmear, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, adopted a Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement (the “Trading Arrangement”) intended to satisfy the affirmative defense conditions of Rule 10b5-1(c) under the Exchange Act. The Trading Arrangement is intended to provide for “…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice