OMQS — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of OMQS's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-18 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-20
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +16 | −6 | ~10 | 17 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 10 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | +1 | −1 | 0 | 3 |
| Other information | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Market risk (Item 3), Risk factors
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-18
The loss from operations for the six months ended June 30, 2026, was $3.5 million, an increase of $2.4 million compared with the loss in the six months ended June 30, 2025, of $678 thousand. Basic loss per share from continuing operations for the six months ended June 30, 2026, was ($0.16) versus ($…
Comprehensive loss for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 was $2.5 million and $1.9 million respectively, the only component to comprehensive loss besides net loss is foreign currency translation.
As of June 30, 2026, the Company had cash in the amount of $1.1 million and a working capital deficit of $15.2 million, compared to cash in the amount of $679 thousand, and a working capital deficit of $13.2 million as of December 31, 2025. The Company had stockholders’ deficit attributable to OmniQ…
The Company’s accumulated deficit was $126.4 million and $124 million as of June 30, 2026, and December 31, 2025.
The Company’s operations provided net cash of $877 thousand and provided $6.1 million in the six months ended June 30, 2026, and 2025, respectively. The decrease in cash provided in operations of $5.2 million is due to the decrease in revenue.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-20
The loss from operations for the three months ended March 31, 2026, was $1.26 million, an increase of $841 thousand compared with the loss in the three months ended March 31, 2025, of $425 thousand. Basic loss per share from continuing operations for the three months ended March 31, 2026, was ($0.13…
As of March 31, 2026, the Company had cash in the amount of $787 thousand and a working capital deficit of $14.6 million, compared to cash in the amount of $679 thousand, and a working capital deficit of $13.2 million as of December 31, 2025. The Company had stockholders’ deficit attributable to Omn…
The Company’s accumulated deficit was $125.7 million and $124 million as of March 31, 2026, and December 31, 2025.
The Company’s operations provided (used) net cash of $70 thousand and provided $1 million in the three months ended March 31, 2026, and 2025, respectively. The decrease in cash provided in operations of $1 million is due to the decrease in revenue.
The Company’s cash used in investing activities was $26 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2026, compared to cash used in investing activities of $31 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2025.
Legal proceedings
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-18
On November 3, 2024 a commercial real estate company filed a lawsuit against Dangot Computers, OMNIQ Technologies and some of Dangot’s officers alleging breach of a letter of intent for a lease arrangement. The claims were brought in an Israeli court. The initial claim against Dangot Computers is NI…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-20
On November 3, 2024 a commercial real estate company filed a lawsuit against Dangot Computers, OMNIQ Technologies and some of Dangot’s officers alleging breach of a letter of intent for a lease arrangement. The claims were brought in an Israeli court. The initial claim against Dangot Computers is NI…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice