ONCO — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of ONCO's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-13 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-13
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +38 | −22 | ~12 | 86 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~4 | 13 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | Some risk factors updated | +14 | −1 | ~5 | 46 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-13
There were two new peer-reviewed scientific publications published in the first quarter of 2026 on the clinical utility of Proclarix. The first paper, by Schiess et al., has been accepted for publication in BMC Cancer, an open-access oncology research journal. The study evaluated Proclarix in a coho…
Proclarix is CE-marked and for sale in Europe. In the United Kingdom, Proclarix is now offered by a patient organization as an additional option within a screening initiative for early identification of prostate cancer.
We continue our sales efforts and expect growing revenues from sales of Proclarix in 2026 and beyond. We anticipate these sales to offset some expenses relating to commercial scale up and development, we expect our expenses also to increase in connection with our ongoing activities, as we:
As of June 30, 2026, Proteomedix has initiated a PRIME study, a multi-center clinical validation study conducted in collaboration with Labcorp to evaluate Proclarix in the U.S. market and across various ethnicities. The first participants have been enrolled and the study is designed to ultimately in…
On July 28, 2026, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement (the “Series F Securities Purchase Agreement”) with an accredited investor (the “Series F PIPE Investor”), pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue and sell to the Series F PIPE Investor an aggregate of 37,812 shares of …
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-13
Proclarix is CE-marked and for sale in Europe. We continue our sales efforts and expect growing revenues from sales of Proclarix in 2026 and beyond. We anticipate these sales to offset some expenses relating to commercial scale up and development, we expect our expenses also to increase in connectio…
On February 3, 2026, the Company held a special meeting of stockholders (the “Special Meeting”), whereby its stockholders approved an amendment to the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to effect a reverse stock split of all of the outstanding shares of Common Stock at a rat…
On March 6, 2026, the Board determined to fix a reverse stock split ratio of its Common Stock of 1-to-5 (the “Reverse Stock Split”). On March 24, 2026, the Company filed the Amendment to its Charter with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware to effect the Reverse Stock Split. The Reverse S…
Resignation of Andrew Oakley and Thomas Meier as Directors; Elections of Sammy Dorf as Chairman of the Board
Effective on April 20, 2026, Andrew Oakley and Thomas Meier notified the Board of their resignation from the Board. As a result of their resignation from the Board and effective as of the date mentioned herein, Mr. Oakley has also resigned from his position as Chairman of the Board and his service o…
Risk factors
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-13
The SEC had recently approved a Nasdaq rule where the market value of listed companies on Nasdaq must meet a certain threshold, and if we are unable to regain or maintain compliance with such continued listing requirements of Nasdaq, our Common Stock could be delisted from the Nasdaq Capital Market.
On July 22, 2026, the SEC approved a Nasdaq rule change requiring the immediate suspension and delisting of any listed company whose market value of listed securities (“MVLS”) falls below $5 million for 30 consecutive business days, subject to limited review by a Nasdaq Hearings Panel. Under the app…
Our ability to maintain compliance with the $5 million MVLS requirement depends on a number of factors, including the market price of our Common Stock and the number of our issued and outstanding shares. The market price of our Common Stock may be volatile and could decline for reasons beyond our co…
●general market conditions or downturns in the broader equity markets;
●actual or perceived short selling activity or other trading dynamics;
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-13
Our ability to raise additional funds will depend on financial, economic, and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. We cannot be certain that additional funding will be available on acceptable terms, or at all. We have no committed source of additional capital and if we are unable to …
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice