ONFO — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of ONFO's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-19 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-15
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +34 | −15 | ~12 | 57 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~3 | 5 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | Text added/removed | +10 | 0 | ~1 | 12 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Market risk (Item 3)
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-19
The second quarter of 2026 saw continued integration of our agencies, while the Company focused on improving operating results across the portfolio. Revenue for the quarter was $1.50 million, compared to $3.15 million in Q2 2025. Loss from operations was $0.97 million, compared to $0.51 million in Q…
The second quarter was a challenging one, with our portfolio companies focused on preserving cash flow and reducing expenses. There were standout performers, notably RevenueZen, whose results improved significantly after Eastern Standard took over management of its fulfilment, but overall portfolio …
On April 10, 2026, we entered into an equity purchase agreement with an institutional investor providing for the sale of up to $100 million of newly issued common stock, subject to the conditions described in Note 8. We believe this equity purchase facility can provide financing to grow our portfoli…
Management is also exploring acquisitions in which a substantial portion of the purchase price would be deferred, which could allow us to add profitable operations before accessing additional capital.
A principal focus of management is on cash and on managing our debt. Subsequent to June 30, 2026, we settled the remaining balance owed under our Senior Secured Convertible Notes, including accrued liquidated damages and Floor Penalties, through the issuance of common stock, and no principal remaine…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-15
The first quarter of 2026 was a transitional quarter during which we continued the integration of our agencies into a more unified "AgencyCo" structure, and Proofread Anywhere continued to scale its advertising spend in a more profitable manner. Revenue for the quarter was $1.87M, compared to $2.81M…
At the portfolio level, the integration of RevenueZen with Eastern Standard, referenced in our prior filings, continued during the quarter and contributed to lower subcontractor costs at RevenueZen. Management also reports improvements in net margin and new-sales activity at RevenueZen during the qu…
In November 2025, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement providing for the issuance of up to $300 million in Senior Secured Convertible Notes, of which $6 million was issued at the initial closing (see Note 10). In April 2026, subsequent to quarter end, we entered into an Equity Purchase Fa…
With the recently established financing arrangements in place, our focus remains on managing the existing portfolio while continuing to evaluate accretive acquisition opportunities.
The Company reported a net loss of $2,572,611, which includes $365,142 in non-cash expenses, a $654,745 default penalty for liquidated damages, a $674,157 non-cash loss on the change in fair value of digital assets, and a $71,392 non-cash loss on the change in fair value of derivative liabilities, f…
Risk factors
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-19
We are not in compliance with certain of Nasdaq’s continued listing requirements, and additional recently effective Nasdaq rules provide for immediate delisting with no compliance period. If we are unable to regain and maintain compliance, our common stock and warrants will be delisted from Nasdaq.
On May 26, 2026, we received a notice from the Listing Qualifications Department of Nasdaq stating that we were not in compliance with the minimum stockholders’ equity requirement of Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(b)(1), which requires listed companies to maintain stockholders’ equity of at least $2,500,0…
On July 2, 2026, we received a notice from Nasdaq stating that we were not in compliance with the minimum bid price requirement of Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(a)(2), as the closing bid price of our common stock was below $1.00 per share for 30 consecutive business days. We have until December 29, 2026 …
Further, effective July 22, 2026, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission initially approved changes to Nasdaq Listing Rules 5550(a)(6) and 5810(c)(1), creating an immediate Staff Delisting Determination with no compliance period if a company’s Market Value of Listed Securities (“MVLS”) stays be…
If our common stock and warrants were delisted from Nasdaq, we would expect trading, if any, to occur on an over-the-counter market, which would likely reduce the liquidity and market price of our common stock, impair our ability to raise capital, including under the Equity Purchase Facility Agreeme…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice