PGOL — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of PGOL's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-05-15 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-11-12
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +6 | −6 | ~9 | 15 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 1 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Legal proceedings, Risk factors
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-15
Comparison of the Three Months Ended March 31, 2026 to the Three Months Ended March 31, 2025
During the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, we had no revenue resulting from the Moss Mine royalty (see Note 4). We are currently exploring and developing our properties and are actively reviewing new projects.
Net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2026 was ($273,021) compared to net loss of ($400,106) for the three months ended March 31, 2025. The change in profitability is primarily due to the approximate $74,000 decrease in general and administrative expenses and a $35,000 decrease in consulting…
For the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, general and administrative expenses were $215,339 and $289,526, respectively. The decrease in 2026 is primarily due to a decrease in legal fees.
For the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, other income (expenses) were $24,236 and $13,386, respectively. The change in other income/expense is due to an approximate $19,000 increase in unrealized gains on marketable securities, and a $8,000 increase in currency exchange, offset by a $16,0…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-12
Comparison of the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2025 to the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2024
During the three months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, we reported no revenues from the Moss Mine royalty. Please refer to Note 4 of the footnotes for an explanation of our decision not to report revenue for this period. During the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, we had revenues o…
Net loss for the three months ended September 30, 2025 was ($251,197) compared to net loss of ($364,517) for the three months ended September 30, 2024. Net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 was ($1,226,233) compared to a net loss of ($1,234,000) for the nine months ended September 30…
For the three months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, general and administrative expenses were $34,605 and $93,944, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, general and administrative expenses were $795,847 and $662,726, respectively. The increase in 2025 is primarily d…
For the three months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, other income (expenses) were ($8,212) and ($11,470), respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, other income (expenses) were $2,511 and $23,791, respectively. The change in other income/expense is due to an approximate…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice