PRKA — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of PRKA's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-07 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-11
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +33 | −23 | ~49 | 61 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 1 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-07
“Current 2025 Term Loan” – Amended and Restated Term loan credit agreement, dated as of June 17, 2026, between the Company and Cendera Bank.
“Former 2025 Term Loan” – Term loan credit agreement, dated as of September 30, 2024, between the Company and Cendera Bank, N.A.
● “SEC” – The United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
Dollar Amount % of Total Revenue Dollar Amount % of Total Revenue
Consolidated and Segment Results of Operations for Third Quarter 2026 as Compared to Third Quarter 2025
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-11
● “2025 Term Loan” – Term loan credit agreement, dated as of September 30, 2024, between the Company and Cendera Bank N.A.
Consolidated and Segment Results of Operations for Second Quarter 2026 as Compared to Second Quarter 2025
Texas Park revenue was $681,137 in Second Quarter 2026, an increase of $102,001 or 17.6% compared to $579,136 during Second Quarter 2025. While overall attendance was down in Second Quarter 2026 compared to Second Quarter 2025, admission revenue increased due to increased admission ticket prices. In…
Georgia Park attendance increased approximately 7.9% during Second Quarter 2026 compared to Second Quarter 2025. This was primarily driven by more favorable weather conditions compared to Second Quarter 2025. In Second Quarter 2025 we experienced adverse weather conditions and a two-day power outage…
Missouri Park attendance increased by approximately 9.8% during Second Quarter 2026 compared to Second Quarter 2025 primarily driven by more favorable weather conditions during the winter months compared to Second Quarter 2025. In Second Quarter 2025 we experienced adverse weather conditions and sno…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice