PRKR — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of PRKR's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-05-07 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-11-12
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +12 | −13 | ~4 | 5 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 1 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Market risk (Item 3)
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-07
On April 21, 2026, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ("CAFC") has scheduled oral arguments for June 1, 2026 in our expedited appeal of the district court decision in ParkerVision v. Qualcomm.
The patent infringement trials against MediaTek and Realtek, scheduled to commence in March 2026 and April 2026, respectively, were postponed by the district court pending updates to the expert reports and related briefings. The parties have submitted proposed amended scheduling orders to the court …
See Note 12 to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for a complete update on our legal proceedings.
On March 13, 2026, we entered into exchange agreements with certain holders of our outstanding convertible promissory notes. Pursuant to the agreements, the holders agreed to exchange the outstanding principal amount of the notes held by them, together with accrued and unpaid interest thereon throug…
We used cash for operations of approximately $0.9 million and $1.8 for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively. The decrease in cash used for operations from 2025 to 2026 is primarily due to accrued bonuses paid in and increases in legal, accounting and other third-party profess…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-12
In April 2025, the district court initially denied, and then granted on reconsideration, a Qualcomm motion for a third claim construction briefing on two previously undisputed claim terms that were critical to the September 2024 appellate court decision. On May 30, 2025, following briefings by both …
We used cash for operations of approximately $4.1 million and $2.1 for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively. The increase in cash used for operations from 2024 to 2025 is primarily due to accrued bonuses paid and increases in legal, accounting and other third-party profess…
At September 30, 2025, we had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $0.9 million, an accumulated deficit of $455.6 million, and a working capital deficit of $1.8 million. At September 30, 2025, we had $2.9 million in current liabilities, including approximately $1.6 million in convertible debt …
Our convertible notes have conversion prices that are below the market price of our common stock as of September 30, 2025. We anticipate that all of our outstanding convertible notes will either (i) be converted by the holders prior to their scheduled maturity dates, or (ii) have their maturity date…
In May 2025, we filed a shelf registration statement ("Shelf") on Form S-3 that allows us to offer and sell, from time-to-time, up to $25 million of common stock, warrants, or any combination thereof. The Shelf is intended to provide us flexibility to registered sales of securities, subject to marke…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice