PRTA — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of PRTA's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-06 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-07
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +26 | −24 | ~27 | 63 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | −1 | ~1 | 4 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 2 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | Some risk factors updated | +14 | −10 | ~23 | 339 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-06
10-Q, Part II Item 1A “Risk Factors” of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and in our other filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
treatment difference of 13.45 meters in the six-minute walk test (6MWT) vs. placebo. Statistical significance was not achieved on the 6MWT endpoint, however this was potentially due to the small sample size and relatively short study duration. In addition, across a wide range of echocardiographic pa…
Moponetug (formerly BMS-986446/PRX005) for the Potential Treatment of Alzheimer’s Disease
Moponetug is designed to be a best-in-class anti-tau antibody that specifically binds with high affinity the R1, R2, and R3 repeats within the microtubule binding region (“MTBR”) of tau and targets both 3R and 4R tau isoforms. MTBR-tau has been shown in preclinical studies to be involved in the path…
In October 2025, we announced that Bristol Myers Squibb obtained Fast Track designation from the U.S. FDA for moponetug for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. The FDA’s Fast Track designation program is designed to expedite the development and review of drugs intended to treat a serious condition…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-07
study at the International Conference on Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s Diseases and Related Neurological Disorders (“AD/PD 2026”). Longer term data from the PADOVA OLE study in early-stage PD showed a sustained effect of prasinezumab in slowing Parkinson’s progression on top of effective symptomatic t…
aggregate purchase price consists of an upfront payment and development and sales milestone payments totaling up to $1.23 billion. We have earned approximately $150 million to date.
BMS-986446 (formerly PRX005) for the Potential Treatment of Alzheimer’s Disease
BMS-986446 is designed to be a best-in-class anti-tau antibody that specifically binds with high affinity the R1, R2, and R3 repeats within the microtubule binding region (“MTBR”) of tau and targets both 3R and 4R tau isoforms. MTBR-tau has been shown in preclinical studies to be involved in the pat…
In October 2025, we announced that Bristol Myers Squibb obtained Fast Track designation from the U.S. FDA for BMS-986446 for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. The FDA’s Fast Track designation program is designed to expedite the development and review of drugs intended to treat a serious conditio…
Market risk (Item 3)
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-07
2025. If we increase our business activities that require the use of foreign currencies, we may be exposed to losses if the euro and other such currencies continue to strengthen against the U.S. dollar.
Risk factors
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-06
Research, development, and potential commercialization of our drug candidates will require substantial additional cash to fund expenses. Our strategy includes potentially collaborating with additional leading pharmaceutical and biotechnology
launch, and/or increase our costs for our drug candidates, any of which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and/or growth prospects.
In addition, the strength of patents in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical field can be uncertain, and evaluating the scope of such patents involves complex legal, factual, and scientific analyses and has in recent years been the subject of much litigation, resulting in court decisions, including …
United States. These products may compete with our products and our patents or other intellectual property rights may not be effective or adequate to prevent them from competing.
If disputes over intellectual property that we have licensed prevent or impair our ability to maintain our current licensing arrangements on acceptable terms, we may be unable to successfully develop and commercialize the affected drug candidates. We are generally also subject to all of the same ris…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-07
Research, development, and potential commercialization of our drug candidates will require substantial additional cash to fund expenses. Our strategy includes potentially collaborating with additional leading pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies to assist us in furthering research, development…
In addition, the strength of patents in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical field can be uncertain, and evaluating the scope of such patents involves complex legal, factual, and scientific analyses and has in recent years been the subject of much
litigation, resulting in court decisions, including Supreme Court decisions, which have increased uncertainties as to the ability to enforce patent rights in the future. We cannot guarantee that any patents will issue from any pending or future patent applications owned by or licensed to us or our a…
If disputes over intellectual property that we have licensed prevent or impair our ability to maintain our current licensing arrangements on acceptable terms, we may be unable to successfully develop and commercialize the affected drug candidates.
We are generally also subject to all of the same risks with respect to protection of intellectual property that we license as we are for intellectual property that we own, which are described below. If we or our licensors fail to adequately protect this intellectual property, our ability to commerci…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice