PSBD — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of PSBD's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-05-06 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-11-05
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +20 | −16 | ~33 | 72 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 3 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 1 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | Some risk factors updated | 0 | −2 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-06
The weighted average yield of our debt and income producing securities is not the same as a return on investment for our stockholders but, rather, relates to a portion of our investment portfolio and is calculated before the payment of our fees and expenses. There can be no assurance that the weight…
The Investment Advisor employs an active relative value scoring system to monitor corporate debt and equity investments throughout the life of the investment. Existing positions are assigned a score of 5 to 1 to each position, which is updated on an ongoing basis and the Investment Advisor’s analyst…
5. Add Now Where Possible/Outperforming or Compelling Relative Value
4. Performing At or Above Plan/Add on Relative Where Applicable
The following table shows the distribution of our debt and equity investments on the 1 to 5 investment risk rating scale range at fair value as of March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025:
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-05
disruptions related to tariffs and other trade or sanctions issues, which may have a material adverse effect on global economic conditions and the stability of global financial markets, and may significantly reduce global trade;
loss of key personnel, and the illiquid nature of our investments; and
The following table represents the operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024.
Net expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2025 were $18.0 million, which consisted of $12.8 million in interest expense, $2.2 million in management fees, $2.0 million in incentive fees, $1.1 million in other operating expenses, and $38 thousand in directors fees. Net expenses for the nin…
Net expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2024 were $21.6 million, which consisted of $15.7 million in interest expense, $2.4 million in management fees, $2.2 million in incentive fees, $1.2 million in other operating expenses, and $38 thousand in directors fees. Net expenses for the nin…
Risk factors
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-05
Changes to United States tariff and import/export regulations may have a negative effect on our portfolio companies.
The United States has recently enacted and proposed to enact significant new tariffs. Additionally, there has been ongoing discussion and commentary regarding potential significant changes to U.S. trade policies, treaties and tariffs, creating significant uncertainty about the future relationship be…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice