QETA — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of QETA's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-14 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-15
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +8 | −3 | ~9 | 21 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 2 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | +1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Market risk (Item 3), Legal proceedings, Risk factors
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-14
On July 6, 2026, the chief executive officer of SKG discussed in an interview published by Sing Tao Headline SKG’s strategic partnership with KEC (Hong Kong) Limited, a subsidiary of KLN Logistics Group Limited, to jointly develop a cross-border e-commerce logistics platform, with SKG providing the …
The increase in net income for the three months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2025 was primarily due to a gain on forgiveness of promissory loan, interest earned on cash and investments held in the Trust Account, partially offset by lower formation and operational c…
For the six months ended June 30, 2026, we had net income of $871,383, which consisted of interest earned on cash and investments held in the Trust Account of $342,988, gain on forgiveness of promissory note of $1,040,000, interest income of $442, partially offset by formation and operational costs …
For the six months ended June 30, 2025, we had a net loss of $801,621, which consisted of formation and operational costs of $1,101,101, related party administrative fees of $60,000, franchise tax expense of $20,200, and income tax expense of $94,242, partially offset by interest income of $7,560 an…
The increase in net income for the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025 was primarily due to a gain on forgiveness of promissory loan and a decrease in formation and operational costs, partially offset by lower interest earned on cash and investments held in …
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-15
The decrease in net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2026 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2025 was primarily due to a significant decrease in formation and operational costs and lower income tax expense, partially offset by lower interest earned on cash and investments held in …
On January 10, 2025, in connection with the special meeting of stockholders, holders of 5,199,297 shares exercised their right to redeem such shares for a pro rata portion of the funds held in the trust account. As a result, approximately $55.2 million was removed from the trust account to pay such …
We have no obligations, assets or liabilities, which would be considered off-balance sheet arrangements as of March 31, 2026. We do not participate in transactions that create relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, often referred to as variable interest entities, which…
Other information
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-14
During the three months ended June 30, 2026, no director or officer of the Company adopted, modified, or terminated a Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement or a non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement, in each case, as defined in Item 408 of Regulation S-K.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice