QINDvs its industry peers
A metric-by-metric comparison of QIND against SIC 3590 — valuation, growth, profitability, quality and total return, with each figure's rank within the peer group. Every value is Go-computed from SEC filings and delayed prices; ranks are sorted positions within the group only — descriptive, not advice.
| Company | Market cap | P/E (TTM) | P/B | P/S | Revenue growth (YoY) | Earnings growth (YoY) | EBIT margin | ROE | ROIC | Piotroski F | 1y total return | Dividend yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QINDThis | — | — | — | — | 45.9%#2 | -940.9%#5 | -2.8%#1 | -732.3%#2 | -51.0%#2 | 3#1 | — | — |
| VHUB | $79M#1 | — | — | 91.5x#1 | — | -564.3%#4 | -4561.4%#3 | — | — | — | — | — |
| CLEV | — | — | — | — | -9.6%#3 | 7.0%#1 | -7270.7%#4 | — | — | — | — | — |
| HTOO | $5M#4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | -49.9%#1 | — |
| NGTF | — | — | — | — | 440.2%#1 | -150.8%#2 | -942.8%#2 | -9.8%#1 | -4.5%#1 | — | — | — |
| SHMDW | $28M#3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SMX | $31M#2 | — | 3.5x#1 | 2405.2x#2 | — | -393.2%#3 | -1125300.0%#5 | -1971.4%#3 | — | — | — | — |
Peer set: US filers sharing this company's SEC industry classification (SIC 3590). SIC is coarse — conglomerates and multi-segment companies map imperfectly. Values from SEC filings + delayed prices; ranks are within-group positions only. Market cap, P/E, P/B, P/S, 1y total return and dividend yield are computed from each member's latest snapshot price when the table is built (see as-of; snapshot prices can lag) — not live. Some peers are still being computed, so this table covers part of the group and ranks are within the rows shown; it fills in shortly. This table timed out mid-build, so it covers part of the group; ranks are within the rows shown and it fills in shortly. Table built 2026-09-16.
Source: SEC XBRL filings + delayed prices · ranks are within-group positions · For reference only · Not investment advice