RGBPP — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of RGBPP's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-17 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-14
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +17 | −23 | ~2 | 3 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 1 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | +2 | −1 | 0 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Risk factors, Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-17
Amount Percent of Revenue Amount Percent of Revenue Amount Percentage
Amount Percent of Revenue Amount Percent of Revenue Amount Percentage
Revenues from continuing operations were $59,065 for the three months ended June 30,2026 and $59,065 for the same period ended 2025. $27,425 of revenue from related parties recognized during the three months ended June 30, 2026 consisted of anniversary expense receivable pursuant to a license grante…
Operating Expense were $34,536 for the three months ended June 30, 2026 and $ 99,821 for the same period ended 2025. The primary operating expense for 2026 consists of $ 20,694 of Consulting & Professional expenses. In the same period in previous year Consulting and Professional fees expenditure wer…
For the three months ended March 31 2026, the Company reported a net other loss of $662,313 whereas in the same period ended 2025 the Company reported the net other income (loss) of $(126,536). Net other income for the quarter ended 2026 was primarily driven by Derivative Loss of $623,200 recognized…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-14
Revenues from continuing operations were $59,065 for the three months ended March 31,2026 and $59,065 for the same period ended 2025. $27,425 of revenue from related parties recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2026 consisted of anniversary expense receivable pursuant to a license gran…
Operating Expense were $212,774 for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and $ 172,414 for the same period ended 2025. The primary operating expense for 2026 consists of $ 178,454 of Consulting & Professional expenses. In the same period in previous year Consulting and Professional fees expenditure…
For the three months ended March 31 2026, the Company reported a net other income of $1,145,636 whereas in the same period ended 2025 the Company reported the net other income of $93,995. Net other income for the quarter ended 2026 was primarily driven by Derivative Income of $1,181,680 recognized d…
The Company recognized an Operating Loss of $153,709 during the three months ended March 31, 2026 whereas the Company recognized an Operating Loss of $113,349 for the same period ended 2025. The increase in operating loss is primarily attributable to an increase in all expense categories other than …
Net Income is $ 991,927 for the three months ended March 31, 2026 as opposed to a Net Loss of $19,354 for the same period ended 2025. The difference is primarily attributable to the recognition by the Company of greater Derivative Income during the period ended in 2026.
Legal proceedings
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-17
On April 13, 2026 a complaint was filed against the Company in the Superior Court of California, County of San Diego. Trillium Partners, LP,( the “ Plaintiff”), who has acquired rights to $398,740 of claims against the Company, sought damages in that amount along with attorneys’ fees and costs.
On May 14, 2026 the Company and the Plaintiff entered into a Settlement and Mutual Release Agreement (“Agreement”). Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Agreement following the entry of an Order by the Court after a fairness hearing pursuant to Section 3(a) (10) of the Securities Act of 1933 …
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-14
On April 13, 2026 a complaint was filed against the Company in the Superior Court of California, County of San Diego . The Plaintiff, who has acquired rights to $398,740 of existing claims against the Company, is seeking damages in that amount along with attorneys’ fees and costs, The Company has en…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice