RGLD — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of RGLD's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-06 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-07
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +62 | −35 | ~14 | 23 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 2 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | +2 | −2 | 0 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Legal proceedings
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-06
We are continually reviewing opportunities to grow our portfolio, whether through the creation or acquisition of new or existing stream or royalty interests or other acquisition activity. We generally have acquisition opportunities in various stages of review. Our review process may include, for exa…
opportunity; analysis of technical, financial, legal, environmental, social, governance and other confidential information regarding an opportunity; submission of indications of interest and term sheets; participation in preliminary discussions and negotiations; and involvement as a bidder in compet…
On April 14, 2026, after the technical approval of the environmental impact assessment and publication of a pre-feasibility study for the Warintza project, we advanced Solaris Resources, Inc. (“Solaris”) $50 million of the $100 million outstanding conditional funding. The remaining $50 million payab…
Settlement of Fixed Delivery Obligation for the Relief Canyon Mine
On June 11, 2026, Royal Gold and Americas Gold and Silver Corporation ("Americas") closed an agreement to settle the remaining fixed delivery obligations owed to Royal Gold related to the Relief Canyon mine. Under the agreement, Americas' obligation to deliver 8,861 ounces of gold over the period be…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-07
We are continually reviewing opportunities to grow our portfolio, whether through the creation or acquisition of new or existing stream or royalty interests or other acquisition activity. We generally have acquisition opportunities in various stages of review. Our review process may include, for exa…
As of March 31, 2026, our conditional funding schedule of $100.0 million related to the acquisition of the Warintza Gold Stream and Royalty Agreements made on May 21, 2025 remains subject to certain conditions.
On April 14, 2026, after the technical approval of the environmental impact assessment and publication of a pre-feasibility study for the Warintza project, we paid Solaris Resources, Inc. (“Solaris”) $50 million of the $100 million outstanding conditional funding. The remaining $50 million payable i…
Gold stream deliveries from Andacollo were approximately 7,700 ounces for the three months ended March 31, 2026, compared to approximately 5,500 ounces for the three months ended March 31, 2025. Stream deliveries typically occur approximately 5 months after mine production. Higher deliveries in this…
three months ended September 30, 2025, compared to the prior year period. Gold stream deliveries are based on a fixed payability factor of 89%.
Other information
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-06
During the three months ended June 30, 2026, no director or officer of the Company adopted or terminated a Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement or non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement, as each term is defined in Item 408(a) of Regulation S-K, other than William Heissenbuttel, the Company's President and C…
June 4, 2026 intended to satisfy the affirmative defense conditions of Rule 10b5-1(c) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, providing for the potential sale of up to 9,700 shares of the Company's common stock through June 30, 2027.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-07
During the three months ended March 31, 2026, no director or officer of the Company adopted or terminated a Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement or non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement, as each term is defined in Item 408(a) of Regulation S-K, other than Paul Libner, the Company's Senior Vice President an…
As previously disclosed, on August 5, 2025, the Company exercised the accordion feature under its revolving credit facility dated June 2, 2017, as amended, increasing aggregate commitments under the revolving credit facility to $1.4 billion. On May 5, 2026, the Company and certain of its subsidiarie…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice