RLBY — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of RLBY's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-14 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-20
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +26 | −21 | ~3 | 17 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 1 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | +1 | −1 | ~2 | 5 |
| Risk factors | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Market risk (Item 3)
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-14
For the second quarter, EOR revenue increased $300, or 8.4%, to $3,873 from $3,573 in the prior-year quarter. For the six-month period, EOR revenue increased $1,040, or 14.2%, to $8,378 from $7,328. The growth was concentrated in lower-margin EOR activity, including increased 1099 EOR volume.
Video Production revenue increased $18, or 52.9%, to $52 from $34 in the prior-year quarter and increased $27, or 32.1%, to $111 from $84 for the six-month period.
Direct Hire generated no revenue during the three or six months ended June 30, 2026, compared with $13 and $23 during the respective 2025 periods.
Gross profit for the three months ended June 30, 2026 decreased $21, or 2.9%, to $692 from $713, while gross margin declined 130 basis points to 13.8% from 15.1%. Although revenue increased, the revenue mix shifted toward lower-margin EOR business, particularly 1099 activity, which more than offset …
EOR gross profit declined by $41, or 9.3%, to $402 from $440 in the prior-year quarter, while gross margin declined to 10.4% from 12.3%, primarily reflecting higher benefit utilization and other employment-related costs.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-20
EOR revenue increased $740, or 19.7%, to $4,495 from $3,755 in the prior-year quarter. The increase was primarily driven by growth from our top client (A), which increased $1,096, or 94.0%.
Staffing revenue increased $65, or 7.0%, to $997 from $932 in the prior-year quarter. The increase was primarily attributable to higher revenue from 2 of our top 10 clients, which increased revenue contributions by $96 (30.5%), and $68 (41.7%). These increases were partially offset by lower activity…
Video Production revenue increased $10, or 20.4%, to $59 from $49 in the prior-year quarter. The increase was primarily attributable to two new clients who accounted for $16 in revenue.
Direct Hire revenue decreased $10 to $0 from $10 in the prior-year quarter, representing a 100% decrease.
Gross profit and margin both increased in the first quarter 2026 compared to the same period in the prior year. Gross profit increased $129, or 20.1%, to $770 from $641, while gross margin improved to 13.9% from 13.5%. The improvement reflected a more favorable client and service mix, pricing realiz…
Legal proceedings
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-14
The difference between the aggregate Awards and the recorded receivable reflects amounts not recognized due to collectability considerations. The $6,422 carrying amount of the related-party notes receivable was satisfied in full through the April 2, 2026 share transfer. Accordingly, no balance due f…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-20
The difference between the aggregate Awards and the recorded receivable reflects amounts not recognized due to collectability considerations. As of March 31, 2026, the recorded balance due from the Vivos Group was approximately $6,422 compared to aggregate Awards totaling approximately $8,887.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice