RTB — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of RTB's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-05-14 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-11-14
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +19 | −27 | ~4 | 16 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | +1 | −1 | ~1 | 0 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | +7 | −8 | ~2 | 2 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Risk factors
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-14
● our ability to effectively execute our business plans for the existing business of the Company and the new business plans of RTB Digital, Inc.;
● our ability to manage our expansion, growth and operating expenses,, including the integration of RTB Digital, Inc.’s business operations;
● our need for, and ability to raise, additional capital to support the development and expansion of the business of RTB Digital, Inc.;
On January 2, 2026, the Company effected a reverse stock split of the Company’s shares of common stock, par value $0.001 (“Common Stock”) outstanding at a ratio of one-for-thirty-five (the “Reverse Stock Split”). All share and per share information in this Report have been retroactively adjusted for…
Substantial doubt exists as to our ability to continue as a going concern based on the fact that we do not have adequate working capital to finance our day-to-day operations. As described in the Notes to the Financial Statements included in our 2025 Form 10-K and in this Report, respectively, for th…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-14
● our ability to manage our expansion, growth and operating expenses domestically;
Substantial doubt exists as to our ability to continue as a going concern based on the fact that we do not have adequate working capital to finance our day-to-day operations. As described in the Notes to the Financial Statements included in our 2024 Form 10-K and in this Report, respectively, for th…
In February 2024, the Company stopped processing credit card payments on its QuickCard platform because our processing partner’s bank informed them that they no longer wished to process payments for cannabis merchants. QuickCard was our first-generation product and was designed to address the needs …
As disclosed in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 11, 2025, we received a written notification from the Nasdaq Listing Qualifications Staff (the “Staff”) on April 8, 2025 notifying us that we were not in compliance with the minimum stockholders’ equity requirement of $2.5 mi…
Departure of Fredi Nisan as Chief Executive Officer and Director and Appointment of George Oliva as Interim Chief Executive Officer
Controls & procedures
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-14
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate disclosure controls and procedures over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act, as amended. Our management, under the supervision and with the participation of our Interim Chief Exec…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-14
Regulations under the Exchange Act require public companies to maintain “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure tha…
Legal proceedings
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-14
On April 27, 2026, the SEC filed a settled action against the Company and its founders, memorializing the previously disclosed settlement. SEC v. RYVYL Inc., et al., Case No. 3:26-cv-02672-WQH-MMP (S.D. Cal.). The proposed final judgment, approved by the Court on May 11, 2026, does not require the C…
● On June 22, 2023, a shareholder derivative complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California against certain of the Company’s current and/or former officers and directors (the “Hertel Defendants”), Christy Hertel, derivatively on behalf of RYVYL Inc., …
The Complaints seeks damages and contribution from the Hertel Defendants and a direction that the Company and the Hertel Defendants take actions to reform and improve corporate governance and internal procedures to comply with applicable laws. The Hertel Defendants deny all allegations of liability …
● On June 25, 2024, J. Drew Byelick, a former Chief Financial Officer of the Company, filed a complaint against the Company in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Case No. ’24CV1096 JLS MSB. Mr. Byelick alleged breach of contract, fraudulent inducement of employ…
● On July 2, 2025, Plaintiff Kapcharge USA Inc. commenced a lawsuit against Defendants Ryvyl Inc., FFS Data Corporation, CML Management, LLC and Cynthia Lambert in San Diego Superior Court, Case No. 25CU035045C. This lawsuit stems from a dispute between Kapcharge on the one hand and FFS Data Corpora…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-14
We have been informed that the disclosures sufficiently addressed the Staff’s concerns. To resolve the potential charges arising from the SEC’s investigation, the Company has consented, without admitting or denying any wrongdoing, to entry of a judgment permanently restraining and enjoining the Comp…
● On February 1, 2023, a putative class action lawsuit titled Cullen v. RYVYL Inc. fka GreenBox POS, et al., Case No. 3:23-cv-00185-GPC-AGS, was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California against several defendants, including the Company and certain of our curr…
● On September 22, 2023, a shareholder derivative complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California against certain of the Company’s current and/or former officers and directors (the “Hertel Defendants”), Christy Hertel, derivatively on behalf of RYVYL I…
The Complaints seeks damages and contribution from the Hertel Defendants and a direction that the Company and the Hertel Defendants take actions to reform and improve corporate governance and internal procedures to comply with applicable laws. The Hertel Defendants deny all allegations of liability …
● On October 1, 2023, the Company filed a demand for arbitration against Sky Financial with the American Arbitration Association in San Diego, California (the “Arbitration”). In the Arbitration, the Company seeks to recover for breach of contract and Sky Financial’s failure to perform its obligation…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice