SCIA — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of SCIA's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-07-30 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-01
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +17 | −15 | ~9 | 2 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | +2 | 0 | ~2 | 4 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Market risk (Item 3), Legal proceedings, Risk factors, Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-07-30
and could cause actual results to differ materially from plans and projections. Although we believe the assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements contained herein are reasonable, there can be no assurance that any of the forward-looking statements included in this Quarterly Report on For…
For the three months ended June 30, 2026, total revenue was a record $9,485,119 compared to $3,609,304 for the three months ended June 30, 2025. Total revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2026, was $17,645,481 versus $7,109,536 for the same period last year. The increase in total revenue for th…
Gross profit was $2,276,455 for the three months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $1,158,157 for the same three months in 2025. Gross profit as a percentage of revenue (gross margin) was 24.0% and 32.1% for the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. Higher revenue contributed to th…
Operating expenses were $876,989 and $802,350 for the three months ended June 30, 2026 and June 30, 2025 respectively. There were increased compensation and benefits for Marketing and Sales, which included additional staff, and higher materials and supplies for Research and Development in the second…
On February 10, 2026, the Company reported it was subjected to an imposter scam of $898,325 executed in conjunction with bank fraud. As of June 30, 2026, the Company recovered $336,299 of that amount resulting in fraud expense of $562,026 recorded in the first quarter. On July 12, 2026, the Company …
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-01
For the three months ended March 31, 2026, total revenue was a record $8,160,362 compared to $3,500,232 for the three months ended March 31, 2025. The increase in revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2026 versus March 31, 2025 was primarily due to higher raw material costs, product mix, and …
Gross profit was $2,035,120 for the three months ended March 31, 2026, compared to $1,072,814 for the same three months in 2025. Higher revenue contributed to the increase in gross profit while higher raw material costs and product mix were the primary reasons for the decreased gross margin for the …
Operating expenses were $1,546,196 for the three months ended March 31, 2026, including fraud expense of $562,026, compared to $770,275 for the same period last year. There were also increased compensation and benefits in the first quarter of 2026, primarily related to timing issues of non-cash stoc…
On February 10, 2026, the Company reported it was subjected to an imposter scam of $898,325 executed in conjunction with bank fraud. As of April 30, 2026, $336,299 has been recovered. Comprehensive efforts continue to be actively pursued to recover the funds involved. The business and operations wer…
For the three months ended March 31, 2026, total revenue was $8,160,362 compared to $3,500,232 for the three months ended March 31, 2025. The increase in revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2026 versus March 31, 2025 was primarily due to higher raw material costs, product mix, and higher vo…
Controls & procedures
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-07-30
with authorizations of management and directors; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.
changes in our internal controls that could materially affect our disclosure controls and procedures after the date of their evaluation.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice