SIEB — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of SIEB's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-05-15 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-11-12
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +69 | −62 | ~25 | 18 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 1 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-15
Results in the businesses in which we operate are highly correlated to general economic conditions and, more specifically, for our financial services businesses, to the direction of the U.S. equity and fixed-income markets. Market volatility, overall market conditions, interest rates, economic, poli…
In addition, in periods of reduced financial market activity, or lower revenue generation from our developing business lines, profitability is likely to be adversely affected because certain expenses remain relatively fixed, including salaries and related costs, as well as portions of communications…
In the three months ended March 31, 2026, loss per share was $0.05, compared to earnings per share of $0.22 in the prior-year period. In the first quarter of 2026, our revenues were $23.5 million and operating loss before taxes was $2.9 million, compared to revenues of $28.9 million and operating in…
For the three months ended March 31, 2026, our results compared to the prior-year period reflected continued growth in certain business lines, including stock borrow / stock loan and investment banking, offset by lower interest-related revenue, higher operating expenses, impairment of goodwill and a…
During the three months ended March 31, 2026, we continued to invest in the expansion of our business lines and supporting infrastructure, which contributed to higher personnel expenses, commission and payout expenses, technology costs, advertising and promotion expense, and costs associated with th…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-12
Results in the businesses in which we operate are highly correlated to general economic conditions and, more specifically, to the direction of the U.S. equity and fixed-income markets. Market volatility, overall market conditions, interest rates, economic, political, and regulatory trends, and indus…
In the third quarter of 2025, earnings per share was $0.04, compared to earnings per share of $0.10 in the third quarter of 2024. In the third quarter of 2025, our revenues were $26.8 million and operating income before taxes was $2.2 million, compared to revenues of $22.6 million and operating inco…
Financial highlights for the three months ended September 30, 2025:
●Principal transactions increased by 9.7% to $4.6 million compared to the prior-year quarter
●Stock borrow / stock loan increased by 73.7% to $10.0 million compared to the prior-year quarter
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice