SINT — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of SINT's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-05-15 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-11-12
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +23 | −39 | ~5 | 13 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 2 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Market risk (Item 3), Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-15
For the three months ended March 31, 2026, total revenue increased $11,000, or 3%, compared to the same period in 2025. When excluding the total revenue decrease of $109,000 due to the sale of the TA&T subsidiary, the remaining total revenue increased by $120,000, or 46%.
For the three months ended March 31, 2026, product revenue increased $9,000, or 3%, compared to the same period in 2025. When excluding the product revenue decrease of $64,000 due to the sale of the TA&T subsidiary, the remaining product revenue increased by $73,000, or 32%.
During the three months ended March 31, 2026, grant and contract revenue increased $2,000, or 3%, as compared to the same period in 2025. When excluding the grant and contract revenue decrease of $45,000 due to the sale of the TA&T subsidiary, the remaining grant and contract revenue increased by $4…
Total revenue for the period was relatively consistent with the prior year, reflecting a combination of underlying growth in the Company’s continuing operations and the impact of changes to its business portfolio.
Revenue from ongoing product lines and customer activities increased compared to the prior year period, driven by growth in the Company’s spine-related product offerings and continued demand within its OEM technical manufacturing business. In addition, activity under grant and contract programs cont…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-12
Biomedical Applications: Since its inception, SINTX has been focused on medical grade silicon nitride. SINTX biomedical products have been shown to be biocompatible, bioactive, antipathogenic, and to have superb bone affinity. Spinal implants made from SINTX silicon nitride have been successfully im…
We believe that silicon nitride has a superb combination of properties that make it suited for long-term human implantation. Other biomaterials are based on bone grafts, metal alloys, and polymers- all of which have well-known practical limitations and disadvantages. In contrast, silicon nitride has…
Antipathogenic Applications: Today, there is a global need to improve protection against pathogens in everyday life. SINTX believes that by incorporating its unique composition of silicon nitride antipathogenic powder into products such as face masks, drapes, filters, sutures, and wound care devices…
We presently manufacture advanced ceramic powders and components in our manufacturing facilities based in Salt Lake City, Utah.
The SINTX Salt Lake City facility is registered with the FDA, is cGMP and ANVISA RDC 665 compliant, as well as being ISO 9001:2015, ISO 13485:2016 certified, and ASD9100D certified. The Company’s products are primarily sold in the United States.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice