SKWD — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of SKWD's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-05-11 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-11-06
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +82 | −51 | ~12 | 13 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | +4 | −4 | 0 | 1 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | Text added/removed | +28 | −18 | 0 | 0 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | +1 | −2 | 0 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-11
As previously disclosed, on January 1, 2026, the acquisition with Apollo closed. We subsequently announced the introduction of Skyward Group as the unified holding company brand for Skyward Specialty and Apollo, following the successful completion of the transaction. The consideration for the entire…
Apollo is an integrated specialty insurance and reinsurance group operating within the Lloyd’s of London market, leveraging Lloyd’s global licensing, centralized underwriting infrastructure, and long‑standing distribution networks to access innovative specialty classes across international markets. …
Skyward Specialty and Apollo continue to operate as distinct, market facing brands under the newly introduced Skyward Group holding structure. This brand architecture preserves the equity and reputational strength of both organizations while supporting a unified strategic direction and enhanced coll…
Skyward Specialty’s U.S. insurance companies are rated ‘A’ (Excellent) by AM Best, while Apollo’s underwriting operations continue within the highly rated Lloyd’s market, which carries an ‘A+' (Superior) rating by AM Best and 'AA-' (Very Strong) ratings by S&P Global and Fitch Ratings.
We discuss certain key metrics which provide useful information about our business and the operational factors underlying our financial performance. These metrics are generally standard among insurance companies and help to provide comparability with our peers. For a glossary of terms for Skyward Sp…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-06
On September 2, 2025, we entered into two share purchase agreements (the "Apollo Majority SPAs") with institutional and management shareholders, respectively, of Apollo Group Holdings Limited ("Apollo") (the "Majority Sellers"). Pursuant to the Apollo Majority SPAs, in accordance with the terms and …
During the first quarter of 2025, we updated our underwriting divisions to align with how management currently oversees the business, allocates resources and evaluates operating performance. We added a ninth division, Agriculture and Credit (Re)insurance, which includes the Global Agriculture unit, …
included in the Transactional E&S division. Programs is now Specialty Programs. Prior reporting periods have been conformed to reflect the new presentation.
All of our insurance company subsidiaries are group rated and have financial strength ratings of “A” (Excellent) with stable outlook from the A.M. Best Company.
The following table summarizes our results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024:
Controls & procedures
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-11
In connection with the preparation of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, our management carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the CEO and CFO, as of March 31, 2026, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure …
In connection with the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2026, the scope of such evaluation excluded Apollo, which was acquired on January 1, 2026. The Company excluded Apollo from the evaluation because the entity and its related systems, processes and controls ar…
Based upon this evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2026.
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by Rule 13a-15(d) and 15d-15(d) of the Exchange Act that occurred during the three months ended March 31, 2026 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to ma…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-06
As previously disclosed within Item 9A. Controls and Procedures of our 2024 Form 10-K, management concluded that a material weakness existed related to the ineffective implementation of information technology general controls (“ITGCs”) in the area of user access for systems that support the Company’…
With the oversight of the Audit Committee, our management has implemented, and is in process of implementing, additional measures to improve our internal control over ITGCs to remediate the material weakness identified above, including (i) conducting a thorough review of existing ITGCs to identify a…
We cannot assure you that the measures we have taken to date, and are continuing to implement, will be sufficient to remediate the identified material weakness, or to avoid potential future material weaknesses or significant deficiencies. While we believe our efforts have improved our internal contr…
Except for the ongoing remediation efforts relating to the material weaknesses identified above, there has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by Rule 13a-15(d) and 15d-15(d) of the Exchange Act that occurred during th…
Risk factors
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-11
In addition to the other information set forth in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, you should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described under the heading “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025 (our “2025 Form 10-K”),…
Increased public attention from regulators, policymakers, investors, and other stakeholders regarding environmental, social and governance matters may expose us to negative public perception, cause reputational harm, impose additional costs on our business or impact our stock price.
Recently, more attention is being directed towards publicly traded companies regarding environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) matters. A wide variety of stakeholders, including institutional investors, regulators, and investor advocacy groups have become increasingly focused on companies’ ESG …
We are subject to extensive regulation, which may adversely affect our ability to achieve our business objectives. In addition, if we fail to comply with these regulations, we may be subject to penalties, including fines and suspensions, which may adversely affect our financial condition and results…
Our primary U.S. insurance subsidiaries, GMIC, HSIC and IIC, are subject to extensive regulation in Texas, their state of domicile, and to a lesser degree, the other states in which they operate. Most insurance regulations are designed to protect the interests of insurance policyholders, as opposed …
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-06
In addition to the other information set forth in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, you should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described under the heading “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024 (our “2024 Form 10-K”),…
Our pending acquisition of Apollo involves a number of risks, the occurrence of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and operating results.
On September 2, 2025, we entered into the Apollo SPAs to acquire Apollo. The acquisition involves certain risks, the occurrence of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and operating results, including:
•delays in completing the acquisition within the expected time period and the risk that the acquisition may not be completed at all;
•diversion of management's attention to complete the acquisition and integrate Apollo’s operations thereafter;
Other information
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-11
During the quarter ended March 31, 2026, none of our directors or officers (as defined in Rule 16a-1(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) adopted, terminated or modified a Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement or non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement (as such terms are defined in Item 408 of Regulatio…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-06
On September 8, 2025, Sandip Kapadia entered into a new Rule 10b5-1 Trading Arrangement. On September 10, 2025, Tom Schmitt terminated an existing Rule 10b5-1 Trading Arrangement and entered into a new Rule 10b5-1 Trading Arrangement on September 11, 2025 replacing the previous plan. The material te…
Date of Adoption, Amendment, or TerminationNature of Trading ArrangementDuration of Trading ArrangementAggregate Number of Securities
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice