SKYE — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of SKYE's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-14 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-11
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +69 | −56 | ~16 | 13 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 2 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
| Risk factors | Some risk factors updated | +78 | −2 | ~1 | 2 |
| Other information | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Market risk (Item 3)
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-14
In October 2025, we announced topline results from our CBeyond Phase 2a proof-of-concept clinical trial of nimacimab administered as a subcutaneous injectable for the treatment of obesity and overweight in the United States. Nimacimab monotherapy arm did not achieve the primary endpoint of weight lo…
19 participants in the combination cohorts completed week 26 were eligible for, and enrolled in the extension study. Seven participants in the combination group completed the additional 26 weeks of treatment lost an additional 7.9% of weight, resulting in a mean weight loss of 22.3% . According to i…
We believe multiple factors may have resulted in the lower than anticipated weight loss results for nimacimab as a monotherapy, including a lower systemic exposure than originally modeled, and a better understanding of tissue exposure required to drive weight loss with peripheral CB1 inhibition.
In March 2026, we initiated an expansion study (Part C) of the CBeyond Phase 2a trial to assess preliminary safety and pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of nimacimab administered intravenously (IV). The expansion study comprised of two cohorts of nimacimab monotherapy (400 mg IV and 600 mg IV) compared t…
that the Cohort Review Committee (CRC) responsible for reviewing safety data generated from the CBeyond Part C Expansion Study, and for approving the opening of enrollment in Cohort 2 has unanimously approved opening the second cohort of the CBeyond Part C Expansion study.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-11
In October 2025, we announced topline results from our CBeyond Phase 2a proof-of-concept clinical trial of nimacimab administered as a subcutaneous injectable for the treatment of obesity and overweight in the United States. We reported the following 26 week data from the CBeyond Phase 2a study:
•The nimacimab monotherapy arm did not achieve the primary endpoint of weight loss compared to placebo (-1.52% vs. -0.26 for placebo, mITT). Preliminary pharmacokinetic analysis suggested an association between exposure and response, indicating that the 200 mg, subcutaneous weekly dose was suboptima…
•At the tested dose and exposure levels, nimacimab 200 mg demonstrated a favorable safety profile with placebo-like tolerability. In combination with semaglutide, there was no increase in gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events. Importantly, there were no increases in neuropsychiatric adverse events re…
•In the combination arm, nimacimab 200 mg, subcutaneous weekly dose plus semaglutide demonstrated a clinically meaningful magnitude of weight loss compared to semaglutide alone (-13.2% vs -10.25%, p=0.0372, mITT), with no plateau being observed through Week 26. In the combination arm, 100% of patien…
◦Nimacimab plus semaglutide showed a change of -11.26cm (1.16cm) in waist circumference versus -8.09cm (1.2cm) for semaglutide alone, resulting in a difference of -3.17cm (1.59cm) (p=0.0492, using least-squares mean (LSM)).
Risk factors
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-14
Separately, on May 13, 2026, we received a notification letter from Nasdaq notifying us that our stockholders’ equity had fallen below the $10.0 million minimum required for continued listing on the Nasdaq Global Market under Nasdaq Listing Rule 5450(b)(1)(A). To resolve this deficiency, we applied …
In addition, on July 22, 2026, the SEC approved Nasdaq's recently proposed rule changes to (i) adopt Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(a)(6) to require issuers listed on the Nasdaq to maintain a minimum Market Value of Listed Securities (as defined in Nasdaq Listing Rule 5005(a)(23)) ("MVLS") of at least $5 …
Unlike many other Nasdaq continued listing standards, the new MVLS requirement does not provide a compliance or cure period before a Staff Delisting Determination is issued. Additionally, a request for a hearing before the Hearings Panel does not automatically stay the suspension of trading. While t…
On July 29, 2026, Nasdaq’s new continued listing requirement requiring companies to maintain at least $5 million in MVLS was automatically stayed. The rule, which the SEC approved on July 22, would have required companies whose MVLS remained below $5 million for 30 consecutive business days to be im…
For now, Nasdaq’s new $5 million MVLS continued listing requirement is not effective. The Commission must decide whether to review the Division’s approval and, if it does, whether to affirm, modify, reverse, set aside, or remand the matter for further proceedings. The Commission may also decline rev…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-11
If the closing bid price of our common stock continues to trade below $1.00 per share, we intend to implement a reverse stock split to attempt to regain compliance, as disclosed in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 19, 2026. However, a reverse stock split requires stockholde…
If we are unable to regain compliance within the applicable cure period, including any available extension, our common stock would be subject to delisting from Nasdaq. Further, even if we regain compliance, we may not be able to sustain compliance with Rule 5450(a)(1) in the long term. A delisting c…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice