SMR — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of SMR's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-05-07 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-11-06
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +33 | −38 | ~1 | 3 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | +2 | −13 | ~1 | 0 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | −13 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Legal proceedings
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-07
Our mission is to provide scalable advanced nuclear technology to produce electricity, heat and clean water to improve the quality of life for people around the world. We are commercializing a modular, scalable electric Light Water Reactor nuclear power plant that we believe will deliver safer scala…
Since our founding in 2007, we have made significant progress towards commercializing the first SMR in the United States. In September 2020, our 12-module design (currently approved for 160 million watts of thermal power
or 50 MWe per NPM) became the first and only SMR to receive an SDA from the NRC. In May 2025, the NRC finalized their review and approved our second SDA application and the associated licensing topical reports for our 6-unit 77 MWe NPM design, giving customers in the United States the ability to ref…
NuScale is actively collaborating with ENTRA1 on development initiatives for the deployment of NuScale’s nuclear technology. ENTRA1 is NuScale’s exclusive global partner for the commercialization and development of our products and services, including NPMs to be included in nuclear power plants. Whi…
Demand for energy in foreign markets is currently being driven by population growth, industrialization and urbanization with countries in Asia contributing the most to international growth. Rising living standards, driven by economic growth, has increased the need for residential electricity, a tren…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-06
Our mission is to provide scalable advanced nuclear technology to produce electricity, heat and clean water to improve the quality of life for people around the world. We are changing the power that changes the world by creating an energy source that is smarter, cleaner, safer and cost competitive.
Our small modular reactor (“SMR”), known as NuScale Power Module™ (“NPM”), provides a scalable power plant solution incorporating enhanced safety, improved affordability and extended flexibility for diverse electrical and process heat applications. Our scalable design provides carbon-free energy at …
Since our founding in 2007, we have made significant progress towards commercializing the first SMR in the United States. In 2017, we submitted our Design Certification Application (“DCA”) to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (“NRC”). On August 28, 2020, the NRC issued its Final Safety Evaluati…
In May 2025, the NRC finalized their review and approved the Company’s SDA application and the associated licensing topical reports for NuScale’s 6-unit 77 MWe NPM design. Customers in the United States are now able to reference the certified design and SDA for expedited construction and operating l…
The Company has partnered with ENTRA1, NuScale’s global strategic partner for commercialization and development of power plants utilizing NPMs. ENTRA1 holds the exclusive rights for the worldwide commercialization, distribution, sales and development of our products, services and power plants. In th…
Controls & procedures
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-07
Our management conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)…
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Rule 13a-15 or 15d-15 under the Exchange Act that occurred during the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that have materially affect…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-06
constraints and that management is required to apply judgment in evaluating the benefits of possible controls and procedures relative to their costs.
Our management conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)…
Material Weakness in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company's annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
During the audit process related to our fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, management identified a material weakness in the design, implementation and documentation of (i) information technology general controls (“ITGC”) and (ii) internal controls across key financial reporting processes, which ar…
Other information
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-06
During the three months ended September 30, 2025, (a) the Company’s chief financial officer, Ramsey Hamady, adopted a plan on September 10, 2025 which is intended to satisfy the affirmative defense of Rule 10b5-1(c) and which runs through September 10, 2026, and provides for the aggregate purchase o…
On November 6, 2025, NuScale Power Corporation (the “Company”) and NuScale Power, LLC (“NuScale LLC” and, together with the Company, “NuScale”), entered into an Exchange Agreement (the “Exchange Agreement”) with Fluor Corporation, a related party of NuScale (together with its subsidiary Fluor Enterp…
•subject to certain restrictions, prior to June 1, 2026, limit the number of sales of Class A Common Stock by Fluor on any day to 3% of the average daily trading volume over the prior 30 days during such days as the Company is in a regularly scheduled open trading window and to 6% during any regular…
•only sell such shares through structured sales transactions with dealers in the form agreed to with NuScale, which structured sales transactions will, among other things, provide for similar trading limitations;
•without the prior written consent of the Company, knowingly transfer shares of Class A Common Stock to any person that owns 10% or more of the outstanding voting securities of the Company or where such transfer would cause such person to own more than 10% or more of the outstanding voting securitie…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice