SMTCvs its industry peers
A metric-by-metric comparison of SMTC against iShares Russell 2000 ETF holdings — valuation, growth, profitability, quality and total return, with each figure's rank within the peer group. Every value is Go-computed from SEC filings and delayed prices; ranks are sorted positions within the group only — descriptive, not advice.
| Company | Market cap | P/E (TTM) | P/B | P/S | Revenue growth (YoY) | Earnings growth (YoY) | EBIT margin | ROE | ROIC | Piotroski F | 1y total return | Dividend yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMTCThis | $10.7B#3 | — | 19.5x#4 | 10.2x#2 | 15.5%#4 | 75.1%#1 | 3.1%#4 | -7.3%#3 | 3.7%#2 | 6#1 | — | — |
| BE | $58.5B#1 | — | 63.5x#5 | 29.2x#4 | 38.9%#1 | -0.1%#4 | 3.6%#3 | -32.8%#4 | 7.0%#1 | 5#2 | 446.1%#1 | 0.0%#1 |
| RMBS | $9.6B#4 | 42.4x#1 | 6.9x#1 | 13.6x#3 | 27.1%#2 | 28.2%#2 | 36.8%#1 | 16.5%#2 | — | — | — | — |
| STRL | $17.2B#2 | 50.2x#2 | 14.5x#3 | 6.9x#1 | 17.7%#3 | 12.7%#3 | 16.3%#2 | 24.4%#1 | 0.0%#3 | 5#2 | — | — |
| RGTI | $4.7B#5 | — | 8.1x#2 | 669.7x#5 | -34.3%#5 | -7.6%#5 | -1194.4%#5 | -37.0%#5 | — | 3#4 | — | — |
Peer set: top holdings of IWM (iShares Russell 2000 ETF), the indexed fund holding this stock at its highest weight — a fund manager's grouping, not Tickwind's judgement. Values from SEC filings + delayed prices; ranks are within-group positions only. Market cap, P/E, P/B, P/S, 1y total return and dividend yield are computed from each member's latest snapshot price when the table is built (see as-of; snapshot prices can lag) — not live. Some peers are still being computed, so this table covers part of the group and ranks are within the rows shown; it fills in shortly. This table timed out mid-build, so it covers part of the group; ranks are within the rows shown and it fills in shortly. Table built 2026-07-31.
Source: SEC XBRL filings + delayed prices · ranks are within-group positions · For reference only · Not investment advice