SNFCA — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of SNFCA's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-10 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-11
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +18 | −4 | ~24 | 10 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~5 | 0 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Risk factors
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-10
Profitability in the six-month period ended June 30, 2026 increased due to (a) a $978,000 increase in gains on investments and other assets, (b) a $408,000 increase in cemetery pre-need sales, (c) a $306,000 increase in net investment income, (d) a $212,000 increase in funeral home at-need sales, (e…
Losses for the six-month period ended June 30, 2026 decreased due to (a) a $4,189,000 decrease in personnel expenses, (b) a $3,579,000 decrease in commissions, (c) a $412,000 increase in the fair value of loan commitments, (d) a $332,000 decrease in rent and rent related expenses, (e) a $254,000 dec…
Net investment income decreased by $4,152,000, or 20.2%, to $16,429,000 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2026, from $20,581,000 for the comparable period in 2025. This decrease was primarily attributable to a $6,116,000 decrease in mortgage loan interest resulting from a decline in the aver…
Six-month period ended June 30, 2026, Compared to Six-month period ended June 30, 2025
Total revenues decreased by $8,626,000, or 5.0%, to $163,655,000 for the six-month period ended June 30, 2026, from $172,281,000 for the comparable period in 2025. Contributing to this decrease in total revenues was a $5,007,000 decrease in mortgage fee income, a $4,853,000 decrease in net investmen…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-11
Gains (losses) on investments and other assets (74) 210 (135)%
Profitability in the three-month period ended March 31, 2026 decreased due to (a) a $353,000 increase in selling, general and administrative expenses, primarily attributable to a $195,000 increase in personnel expenses, (b) a $284,000 decrease in gains on investments and other assets, (c) a $116,000…
Losses for the three-month period ended March 31, 2026 decreased due to (a) a $1,988,000 decrease in personnel expenses, (b) a $1,285,000 decrease in commissions, (c) a $910,000 increase in the fair value of loan commitments, (d) a $556,000 increase in income from loan originations, (e) a $161,000 d…
Net investment income decreased by $701,000, or 3.7%, to $18,501,000 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2026, from $19,202,000 for the comparable period in 2025. This decrease was primarily attributable to a $560,000 increase in investment expenses, a $355,000 decrease in interest on cash an…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice