SRRK — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of SRRK's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-05-07 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-11-14
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +31 | −51 | ~27 | 42 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | +3 | −1 | 0 | 0 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~4 | 1 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | Some risk factors updated | +81 | −79 | ~86 | 285 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | +13 | −1 | 0 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-07
Our lead product candidates include apitegromab, a subcutaneous formulation of apitegromab, and SRK-439.
Apitegromab is a novel, investigational, fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits myostatin activation by selectively binding the pro- and latent forms of myostatin in skeletal muscle. Myostatin is a catabolic agent that functions as a negative regulator of muscle mass, therefore inhibition of …
In October 2024, we announced positive top-line results in SAPPHIRE, a pivotal Phase 3 clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of apitegromab in patients with non-ambulatory Type 2 and Type 3 SMA (which is estimated to represent the majority of the current prevalent SMA patient population…
fill-finish facility. Also in November 2025, the third-party fill-finish facility received a Warning Letter from the FDA. We resubmitted the apitegromab BLA in March 2026 with two third-party fill-finish facilities included, which was accepted by the Agency with a September 30, 2026 Prescription Dru…
A Phase 2 study evaluating apitegromab in patients with FSHD is expected to initiate in mid-2026. We see potential for apitegromab broadly in additional rare, severe, and debilitating neuromuscular diseases where muscle atrophy is a key component of disease pathogenesis, and we are actively explorin…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-14
Based on this proprietary and scalable technology platform, we are building a growing portfolio of novel product candidates to deliver life-changing therapies for people with serious diseases that have high unmet need, including neuromuscular disorders, cardiometabolic disorders, cancer, and other c…
●Apitegromab, an investigational, fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits myostatin activation by selectively binding the pro- and latent forms of myostatin in skeletal muscle and is being developed for the treatment of SMA. We also believe apitegromab could have potential in the treatment of …
●SRK-439, a novel, investigational myostatin inhibitor that has high in vitro affinity for pro- and latent myostatin and maintains myostatin specificity and is being developed for the treatment of neuromuscular diseases.
●SRK-181, an investigational inhibitor of the activation of latent TGFβ1, that is being developed for the treatment of cancers that are resistant to anti-PD-(L)1 antibody therapies.
●SRK-373, a novel, preclinical, investigational TGFβ inhibitor that selectively inhibits the activation of latent TGFβ1 isoform in the context of fibrotic extracellular matrix and that avoids perturbing TGFβ1 presented by cells of the immune system and is being developed for the treatment of fibroti…
Market risk (Item 3)
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-07
As of March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025, we had cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities totaling $479.9 million and $367.6 million, respectively, which included bank deposits, money market funds, U.S. treasury obligations and government agency securities. Our primary exposure to market …
Our operations include activities in countries outside the U.S. As a result, our financial results are impacted by factors such as changes in foreign currency exchange rates or weak economic conditions in the foreign markets where we operate. We do not currently hedge our foreign currency exchange r…
Inflation generally affects us by increasing our cost of labor, research, manufacturing and development costs, and clinical trial costs. We have not seen a significant impact from inflation on our business, financial condition or results of operations as of March 31, 2026. However, a significant or …
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-14
We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act, and are not required to provide the information required under this item.
Risk factors
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-07
●The regulatory approval process for apitegromab in the U.S., EU and other jurisdictions will be lengthy, time-consuming and inherently unpredictable and we may fail to receive or be delayed in receiving regulatory approval of apitegromab, or we may receive regulatory approval for only a subset of S…
●Unfavorable pricing and reimbursement decisions in the EU could significantly delay or limit patient access to apitegromab, if approved, and materially reduce our anticipated revenues. Even if we obtain marketing authorization, the EU health technology assessment bodies and national payors may impo…
●Product development involves a lengthy and expensive process, with an uncertain outcome. We may incur additional costs or experience delays in completing, or ultimately be unable to complete, the development and commercialization of apitegromab, SRK-181, SRK-439, or any future product candidates. M…
that cause, or lead to, a delay in the initiation or completion of clinical trials may also ultimately lead to the denial of regulatory approval or limit market acceptance of our product candidates.
The regulatory approval process for apitegromab in the U.S., EU and other jurisdictions will be lengthy, time-consuming and inherently unpredictable and we may fail to receive or be delayed in receiving regulatory approval of apitegromab, or we may receive regulatory approval for only a subset of SM…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-14
●The regulatory approval process for our product candidates in the U.S., EU and other jurisdictions will be lengthy, time-consuming and inherently unpredictable and we may fail to receive or be delayed in receiving regulatory approval of apitegromab. The Complete Response Letter (“CRL”) received fro…
●Product development involves a lengthy and expensive process, with an uncertain outcome. We may incur additional costs or experience delays in completing, or ultimately be unable to complete, the development and commercialization of apitegromab, SRK-181, SRK-439, or any future product candidates. M…
The regulatory approval process for our product candidates in the U.S., EU and other jurisdictions will be lengthy, time-consuming and inherently unpredictable and we may fail to receive or be delayed in receiving regulatory approval of apitegromab. The Complete Response Letter (“CRL”) received from…
The FDA may seek independent advice from a panel of experts, referred to as an Advisory Committee, on complex or novel issues that may be presented in an application, including issues related to the adequacy of the safety and efficacy data to support approval. The opinion of the Advisory Committee, …
Further, a clinical trial may be suspended or terminated by us, the IRBs for the institutions at which such trials are being conducted, or the FDA, the competent authorities and/or ethics committees of the EU Member States or other regulatory authorities, or recommended for suspension or termination…
Other information
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-07
During the three months ended March 31, 2026, certain of our directors or officers (as defined in Rule 16a-1 (f)) adopted, modified, or terminated a “Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” or a “non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement,” as each term is defined in Item 408(c) of Regulation S-K of the Exchange …
Trading plan intended to satisfy the affirmative defense conditions of Securities Exchange Act Rule 10b5-1(c)
Sale of the Company’s common stock pursuant to the terms of the plan
Trading plan intended to satisfy the affirmative defense conditions of Securities Exchange Act Rule 10b5-1(c)
Sale of the Company’s common stock pursuant to the terms of the plan
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-14
During the three months ended September 30, 2025, none of our directors or officers adopted contracts, instructions or written plans for the purchase or sale of our securities.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice