STOK — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of STOK's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-05-07 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-11-04
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +33 | −42 | ~20 | 40 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 0 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 3 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | Text added/removed | +20 | −18 | ~61 | 360 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | −5 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-07
In March 2026, we filed an automatic universal Shelf Registration Statement on Form S-3 (the “2026 Registration Statement”) with the SEC. The 2026 Registration Statement contains two prospectuses: a base prospectus, which covers the offering, issuance and sale by us of our common stock, preferred st…
securities; and a sales agreement prospectus covering the offering, issuance and sale by us of up to a maximum aggregate offering price of $150.0 million of our common stock that may be issued and sold under the Sales Agreement. The specific terms of any securities to be offered pursuant to the base…
As of March 31, 2026, we had issued approximately 3.2 million shares of common stock pursuant to the 2025 Registration Statement for net proceeds of $87.8 million. In addition, as of March 31, 2026, we had issued approximately 2.6 million shares of common stock pursuant to the Sales Agreement and th…
As of March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025 we had $411.0 million and $390.9 million, respectively, in cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities.
Since inception, we have had operating losses, the majority of which are attributable to research and development activities. Our net losses were $50.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and our net income for the three months ended March 31, 2025 was $112.9 million. As of March 31, 2…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-04
On April 2, 2024, we completed an underwritten public offering, pursuant to the 2022 Registration Statement, of 5,555,557 shares of common stock at a public offering price of $13.50 per share and issued pre-funded warrants to purchase 3,703,730 shares of common stock at a public offering price of $1…
In October 2024, we filed an automatic universal Shelf Registration statement on Form S-3 (the “2024 Registration Statement”) with the SEC. The 2024 Registration Statement contains two prospectuses: a base prospectus, which covers the offering, issuance and sale by us of our common stock, preferred …
In July 2025, we filed a universal Shelf Registration Statement on Form S-3 (the “2025 Registration Statement”) with the SEC. The 2025 Registration Statement was declared effective by the SEC on July 11, 2025.
As of September 30, 2025, we had issued approximately 7.0 million shares of common stock pursuant to the Sales Agreement for net proceeds of $61.0 million pursuant to the 2022 Registration Statement. As of September 30, 2025, we had not issued or sold any shares pursuant to the 2024 Registration Sta…
As of September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024 we had $328.6 million and $246.7 million, respectively, in cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities.
Risk factors
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-07
Further, in June 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed its longstanding approach under the Chevron doctrine, which provided for judicial deference to regulatory agencies, including the FDA. In the future, we cannot be sure whether there will be increased challenges to existing agency regulations or …
The FDA may also impose requirements for costly post-marketing studies or clinical trials and surveillance to monitor the safety or efficacy of any approved product. The FDA closely regulates the post-approval marketing and promotion of drugs and biologics to ensure they are marketed only for the ap…
subject to enforcement action. Moreover, while we believe our product candidates may provide improved safety profiles over existing products, unless we conduct head-to-head studies, we will not be able to make comparative claims for products, if approved.
A Fast Track Designation by the FDA or any use of the accelerated approval pathway, may not lead to a faster development or regulatory review or approval process, and would not increase the likelihood that zorevunersen, STK-002 or our future product candidates will receive marketing approval.
If a drug is intended for the treatment of a serious or life-threatening condition and the drug demonstrates the potential to address unmet medical needs for this condition, the drug sponsor may apply to the FDA for Fast Track Designation. The FDA has broad discretion whether to grant this designati…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-04
demonstrate acceptable safety and efficacy of zorevunersen, STK-002 or our future product candidates, the labeling we obtain through negotiations with the FDA or foreign regulatory authorities may not include data on secondary endpoints and may not provide us with a competitive advantage over other …
insufficient for approval and require additional preclinical, clinical or other studies. In addition, varying interpretations of the data obtained from preclinical and clinical testing could delay, limit or prevent marketing approval of a product candidate.
Further, in June 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed its longstanding approach under the Chevron doctrine, which provided for judicial deference to regulatory agencies, including the FDA. As a result of this decision, we cannot be sure whether there will be increased challenges to existing agency …
current Good Manufacturing Practices (“cGMPs”), quality control, quality assurance and corresponding maintenance of records and documents, including periodic inspections by the FDA and other regulatory authorities and requirements regarding the distribution of samples to providers and recordkeeping.
The FDA may also impose requirements for costly post-marketing studies or clinical trials and surveillance to monitor the safety or efficacy of any approved product. The FDA closely regulates the post-approval marketing and promotion of drugs and biologics to ensure they are marketed only for the ap…
Other information
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-04
*Intended to satisfy the affirmative defense of Rule 10b5-1(c) of the Act.
**Not intended to satisfy the affirmative defense of Rule 10b5-1(c) of the Act.
(1) Except as indicated by footnote, each trading arrangement permitted or permits transactions through and including the earlier of (a) the completion of all purchases or sales or (b) the date listed in the table.
Each new Rule 10b5-1 Plan that was adopted in the above table includes a representation from Drs. Krainer and Tzianabos, respectively, to the broker administering the plan that he was not in possession of any material nonpublic information regarding the Company or the securities subject to the Rule …
Once executed, transactions under a Rule 10b5-1 Plan adopted during the period described above will be disclosed publicly through Form 4 and/or Form 144 filings with the SEC in accordance with applicable securities laws, rules, and regulations. Except as may be required by law, we do not undertake a…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice