TCRI — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of TCRI's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-10 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-06
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +6 | −4 | ~11 | 23 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 1 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Legal proceedings, Risk factors
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-10
The decrease of $6,657 was primarily attributable to lower legal and professional fees incurred during the current period, including reduced costs associated with SEC filings, corporate governance, and other professional advisory services. In addition, the Company incurred lower administrative expen…
For the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, professional expenses were $13,201 and $17,800, respectively. The decrease of $4,599 was primarily attributable to lower legal and professional fees incurred during the current period. During the prior-year period, the Company incurred higher legal co…
For the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, professional and administrative expenses were $6,817 and $12,833, respectively. The decrease of $6,016 was primarily attributable to lower legal and professional fees incurred during the current quarter. During the corresponding period in 2025, the …
For the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, professional expenses were $5,037 and $10,300 respectively. The decrease of $5,263 was primarily due to the absence of significant legal fees incurred in the prior-year quarter for SEC filing and corporate governance matters. Professional fees durin…
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company currently has no operations and has a stockholders defici…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-06
For the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, professional expenses were $8,164 and $7,500, respectively. The increase of $ 664 in professional fees was due to the higher consultation fees for the three months ended March 31, 2026.
For the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, general and administrative expenses were $2,525 and $3,830 respectively. The decrease of $ 1,305 in general and administrative was due mainly attributable to virtual office and mail handling expenses incurred in the prior period ($2,386), which did…
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company currently has no operations and has a stockholders defici…
These factors, among others, raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. However, the shareholder is willing to provide necessary financial support minimum for the next 12 months. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments that might …
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice