TDDWWvs its industry peers
A metric-by-metric comparison of TDDWW against SIC 4400 — valuation, growth, profitability, quality and total return, with each figure's rank within the peer group. Every value is Go-computed from SEC filings and delayed prices; ranks are sorted positions within the group only — descriptive, not advice.
| Company | Market cap | P/E (TTM) | P/B | P/S | Revenue growth (YoY) | Earnings growth (YoY) | EBIT margin | ROE | ROIC | Piotroski F | 1y total return | Dividend yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TDDWWThis | — | — | — | — | 0.5%#2 | 86.3%#2 | 20.9%#3 | 23.9%#1 | 15.1%#1 | 5#1 | — | — |
| EURKU | — | — | — | — | — | 436.0%#1 | — | — | — | — | 0.0%#2 | — |
| GLNG | $5.1B#1 | — | 2.6x#1 | 13.0x#1 | 51.1%#1 | 29.2%#4 | 25.3%#2 | 3.4%#4 | 2.6%#3 | — | 25.7%#1 | — |
| GLOP.PA | — | — | — | — | -21.9%#4 | -113.4%#6 | -5.5%#5 | -27.6%#5 | — | — | — | — |
| TDGMW | — | — | — | — | 0.5%#2 | 86.3%#2 | 20.9%#3 | 23.9%#1 | 15.1%#1 | 5#1 | — | — |
| TNK | — | 9.8x#1 | — | — | -22.6%#5 | -13.0%#5 | 32.5%#1 | 17.2%#3 | — | — | — | — |
Peer set: US filers sharing this company's SEC industry classification (SIC 4400). SIC is coarse — conglomerates and multi-segment companies map imperfectly. Values from SEC filings + delayed prices; ranks are within-group positions only. Market cap, P/E, P/B, P/S, 1y total return and dividend yield are computed from each member's latest snapshot price when the table is built (see as-of; snapshot prices can lag) — not live. Some peers are still being computed, so this table covers part of the group and ranks are within the rows shown; it fills in shortly. This table timed out mid-build, so it covers part of the group; ranks are within the rows shown and it fills in shortly. Table built 2026-09-16.
Source: SEC XBRL filings + delayed prices · ranks are within-group positions · For reference only · Not investment advice