TDUP — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of TDUP's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-05 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-04
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +20 | −12 | ~10 | 14 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 2 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~4 | 0 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | +2 | −1 | 0 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-05
Non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA(1) was $4.8 million, or 5.3% of revenue, for the second quarter of 2026, compared to $3.0 million, or 3.9% of revenue, for the second quarter of 2025, representing an increase of 58.4% year over year.
Gains related to non-marketable equity investments— — — (234)
Comparison of Financial Results for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 and 2025
Revenue increased $13.1 million, or 16.9%, for the three months ended June 30, 2026 as compared to the same period in 2025. The growth in revenue was mainly driven by a 21.9% increase in Orders, supported by higher engagement from both new and returning buyers, partially offset by a 2.9% decrease in…
Revenue increased $23.5 million, or 15.8%, for the six months ended June 30, 2026 as compared to the same period in 2025. The growth in revenue was mainly driven by a 20.6% increase in Orders, supported by higher engagement from both new and returning buyers, partially offset by a 2.3% decrease in t…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-04
Non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA(1) was $2.7 million, or 3.4% of revenue, for the first quarter of 2026, compared to $3.8 million, or 5.3% of revenue, for the first quarter of 2025, representing a decrease of 27.9% year over year.
Comparison of Financial Results for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2026 and 2025
Revenue increased $10.4 million, or 14.6%, for the three months ended March 31, 2026 as compared to the same period in 2025. The growth in revenue was mainly driven by a 19.3% increase in Orders, supported by higher engagement from both new and returning buyers, partially offset by a 1.6% decrease i…
Gross margin was 79.2% for the three months ended March 31, 2026, compared to 79.1% in the same period in 2025, an increase of 10 basis points. Overall, gross margin remained relatively stable between periods.
Operations, product, and technology as a percentage of revenue50.3 %49.3 %
Other information
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-05
On June 15, 2026, Chris Homer, our Chief Operating Officer, adopted a Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement that is intended to satisfy the affirmative defense of Rule 10b5-1(c) of the Exchange Act for the sale of up to 616,728 shares of the Company’s Class A common stock until September 24, 2027.
Other than as disclosed above, during the three months ended June 30, 2026, none of our directors or officers (as defined in Rule 16a-1(f) under the Exchange Act) adopted or terminated any contract, instruction or written plan for the purchase or sale of our securities that was intended to satisfy t…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-04
During the three months ended March 31, 2026, none of our directors or officers (as defined in Rule 16a-1(f) under the Exchange Act) adopted or terminated a “Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” or “non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement,” as those terms are defined in Item 408 of Regulation S-K.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice