TIPT — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of TIPT's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-07-29 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-04-30
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +30 | −26 | ~9 | 6 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
| Controls & procedures | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | +1 | −8 | 0 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Risk factors, Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-07-29
On May 29, 2026, the Company completed the sale of Fortegra, its insurance segment, pursuant to the Sale Agreement entered on September 26, 2025. The total consideration received for the sale of Fortegra consisted of cash proceeds of $1.65 billion, less transaction expenses of $25.0 million in which…
On May 1, 2026, the Company completed the Reliance Transaction, its mortgage segment, to Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC. Total consideration from the transaction consisted of cash proceeds of $49.7 million, subject to customary post-closing adjustments. The disposal group incurred cumulative impa…
Prior to the sales, the assets and liabilities of Fortegra and Reliance were classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2025. Upon completion of the transactions in the three months ended June 30, 2026, the Company transferred control of the respective subsidiaries to the buyers and derecognized…
The following is a summary of Tiptree’s consolidated financial results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025. In addition to GAAP results, management uses the Non-GAAP measure book value per share as a measurement of operating performance. Management believes this measure provide…
See Note (3) Dispositions & Discontinued Operations for further details.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-04-30
On September 26, 2025, Tiptree entered into the Sale Agreement with Purchaser and Fortegra whereby Tiptree and Warburg will sell Fortegra to Purchaser for aggregate consideration of $1.65 billion in cash (subject to certain adjustments set forth in the Sale Agreement). As of March 31, 2026, Tiptree …
On October 31, 2025, Tiptree entered into the Reliance Purchase Agreement with Reliance Buyer and Reliance whereby Tiptree will sell all of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of Reliance to Reliance Buyer for aggregate consideration of 93.5% of Reliance’s tangible book value, or an es…
The following is a summary of our consolidated financial results for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025. In addition to GAAP results, management uses the Non-GAAP measure book value per share as measurement of operating performance. Management believes this measure provides supplemental …
See Note (3) Dispositions, Assets Held for Sale & Discontinued Operations for further details.
For the three months ended March 31, 2026, expenses were $9.0 million, which decreased $4.0 million, or 30.6%, compared to the prior year. For the three months ended March 31, 2026, employee compensation and benefits were $6.8 million, compared to $9.3 million for the prior year, driven by lower inc…
Legal proceedings
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-07-29
The Company and its subsidiaries are parties to legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. Although the outcome of such proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, the Company does not believe that any such proceedings, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material ad…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-04-30
The Company is a defendant in Mullins v. Southern Financial Life Insurance Co., a class action filed in February 2006, in Pike County Circuit Court in the Commonwealth of Kentucky on behalf of Kentucky consumers that purchased certain credit life and disability insurance coverage between 1997-2007. …
Two classes were certified in June 2010: Subclass A includes class members who suffered a disability during the coverage period but allegedly received less than full disability benefits; Subclass B includes all class members whose loan termination date extended beyond the termination date of the cre…
In a series of orders issued in October 2022 on competing motions for partial summary judgment, the court found in favor of the plaintiffs as to the Subclass A breach of contract claim (the “Subclass A Order”) and, as to Subclass B, found that the Company was unjustly enriched to the extent the prem…
In December 2022, the court dismissed the plaintiffs’ KCPA claims as to both Subclass A Order and Subclass B Order. The court also dismissed the plaintiffs’ breach of covenant of good faith and fair dealing claim as to Subclass B Order but declined to dismiss such claim as to Subclass A Order pendin…
In May 2024, the Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals disagreed with the court’s interpretation of the policies at issue and entered an order (the “Court of Appeals Order”) affirming in part, reversing in part, and remanding the Subclass A Order and Subclass B Order. In June 2024, the Company f…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice