TUvs its industry peers
A metric-by-metric comparison of TU against SIC 4812 — valuation, growth, profitability, quality and total return, with each figure's rank within the peer group. Every value is Go-computed from SEC filings and delayed prices; ranks are sorted positions within the group only — descriptive, not advice.
| Company | Market cap | P/E (TTM) | P/B | P/S | Revenue growth (YoY) | Earnings growth (YoY) | EBIT margin | ROE | ROIC | Piotroski F | 1y total return | Dividend yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TUThis | $14.1B#2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| CHT | $386.8B#1 | — | 33.1x#3 | 55.2x#4 | -3.8%#6 | -6.0%#4 | 20.4%#5 | 9.7%#2 | — | — | — | 0.3%#1 |
| CLRI | — | — | — | — | 31.3%#1 | 43.3%#3 | -20.7%#6 | — | — | — | — | — |
| IHS | $2.8B#4 | — | — | 1.8x#2 | 3.6%#4 | 108.8%#2 | 51.9%#1 | — | — | — | — | — |
| KYIV | $2.9B#3 | — | 2.3x#2 | 2.5x#3 | 25.9%#2 | -56.2%#5 | 23.7%#3 | 9.5%#3 | — | — | — | — |
| KYIVW | $1.1B#5 | — | 0.9x#1 | 1.0x#1 | 25.9%#2 | -56.2%#5 | 23.7%#3 | 9.5%#3 | — | — | — | — |
| MLCMF | — | — | — | — | 0.3%#5 | 420.2%#1 | 28.2%#2 | 36.2%#1 | — | — | — | — |
Peer set: US filers sharing this company's SEC industry classification (SIC 4812). SIC is coarse — conglomerates and multi-segment companies map imperfectly. Values from SEC filings + delayed prices; ranks are within-group positions only. Market cap, P/E, P/B, P/S, 1y total return and dividend yield are computed from each member's latest snapshot price when the table is built (see as-of; snapshot prices can lag) — not live. Some peers are still being computed, so this table covers part of the group and ranks are within the rows shown; it fills in shortly. This table timed out mid-build, so it covers part of the group; ranks are within the rows shown and it fills in shortly. Table built 2026-11-07.
Source: SEC XBRL filings + delayed prices · ranks are within-group positions · For reference only · Not investment advice