TXG — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of TXG's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-07 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-08
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +29 | −20 | ~7 | 12 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | +3 | −2 | 0 | 0 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | +1 | 0 | ~2 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-07
On June 8, 2026, we entered into a stock purchase agreement (“SPA”) to acquire 100% of the outstanding shares of common stock of Proteintech Genomics, Inc. (“PTG”), a division of Proteintech Group, Inc. (“Proteintech”), for $6.1 million in cash. PTG specializes in developing high-plex proteomic solu…
Concurrently with the SPA, we and Proteintech entered into a supply agreement under which Proteintech will supply products to us for use in single-cell and spatial analysis. The supply agreement was accounted for separately from the acquisition of the PTG business. The total consideration paid for t…
The fair value measurements used to allocate the total consideration between the supply agreement and the PTG business, as described above, are classified as Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy, as they are based on significant unobservable inputs, including management's estimates of future purc…
The acquisition of the PTG business was accounted for as a business combination using the acquisition method of accounting. The purchase price consideration was preliminarily allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date, inc…
The fair value of the developed technology was estimated using a cost approach, reflecting the estimated current cost to recreate the technology with comparable functionality and utility. The developed technology intangible asset will be amortized over an estimated useful life of 10 years. Because t…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-08
Comparison of the Three Months Ended March 31, 2026 and 2025
Products and services revenue increased $12.1 million, or 9%, to $149.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2025. Consumables revenue increased $14.4 million, or 13%, to
$129.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2025. Instruments revenue decreased $3.6 million, or 24%, to $11.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2025. Services revenue increas…
Excluding $44.1 million of non-recurring license and royalty revenue related to patent litigation settlements in 2025, we expect our revenues to moderately increase in 2026 as compared to 2025.
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $23.4 million, or 26%, to $66.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026, as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2025. The decrease was primarily driven by a $12.2 million decrease in outside legal expenses, a $4.3 million decr…
Controls & procedures
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-07
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) under the Securiti…
our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objective and…
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the three months ended June 30, 2026 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporti…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-08
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Ex…
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the three months ended March 31, 2026 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial report…
Other information
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-07
On June 10, 2026, Adam Taich, our Chief Financial Officer, adopted a Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement that is intended to satisfy the affirmative defense of Rule 10b5-1(c) for the sale of up to 58,267 shares of the Company’s common stock, subject to certain conditions. The expiration date of the trad…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice