UNFI — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of UNFI's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-06-09 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-03-10
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +30 | −31 | ~45 | 69 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 1 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | 0 | −1 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-06-09
We experienced a mix of inflation and deflation across product categories during the third quarter of fiscal 2026. In the aggregate across our businesses, including the mix of products, management estimates our businesses experienced product cost inflation of approximately four percent in the third …
In an inflationary environment, rising vendor costs typically increase Net sales for wholesalers, driven by higher vendor prices when other variables such as quantities sold, mix of units sold and vendor promotions are constant. Under the last-in, first out (“LIFO”) method of inventory accounting, p…
We continue to evaluate our distribution center network to better and more efficiently service customers and suppliers and further optimize performance. In connection with the termination of our supply agreement with a customer in the East region in fiscal 2025, we ceased operations at our Allentown…
The effective tax rate for the third quarter of fiscal 2026 was an expense rate of 21.4% on pre-tax income compared to a benefit rate of 56.3% on pre-tax loss for the third quarter of fiscal 2025. The change from the third quarter of fiscal 2025 is primarily driven by the impact of a partnership inv…
Natural Adjusted EBITDA increased $22 million, or 17.7%, for the third quarter of fiscal 2026 as compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2025. The increase was driven by an increase in gross profit excluding the LIFO charge and other adjustments as outlined in Note 14—Business Segments, partially of…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-03-10
We continue to evaluate our distribution center network to better and more efficiently service customers and suppliers and further optimize performance. In connection with the termination of our supply agreement with a customer in the East region in fiscal 2025, we ceased operations at our Allentown…
We experienced a mix of inflation and deflation across product categories during the second quarter of fiscal 2026. In the aggregate across our businesses, including the mix of products, management estimates our businesses experienced product cost inflation of approximately three percent in the seco…
Generally, in an inflationary environment as a wholesaler, rising vendor costs result in higher Net sales driven by higher vendor prices when other variables such as quantities sold, mix of units sold and vendor promotions are constant. Under the last-in, first out (“LIFO”) method of inventory accou…
The effective tax rate for the second quarter of fiscal 2026 was an expense rate of 13.0% on pre-tax income compared to a benefit rate of 60.0% on pre-tax loss for the second quarter of fiscal 2025. The change from the second quarter of fiscal 2025 is primarily driven by the increase in pre-tax inco…
(in millions)November 1, 2025November 2, 2024Increase (Decrease)November 1, 2025November 2, 2024Increase (Decrease)
Legal proceedings
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-03-10
On December 31, 2024, the Company received a Notice of Potential Violation and Opportunity to Confer (“Notice”) from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) Region VI alleging violations of the Federal Clean Air Act Section 112(r) at one of the Company’s distribution centers. The alleged vi…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice