URGN — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of URGN's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-05 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-06
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +26 | −18 | ~19 | 90 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~3 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~3 | 0 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | +4 | −2 | 0 | 0 |
| Risk factors | Some risk factors updated | +6 | −13 | ~35 | 470 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-05
In March 2025, we announced 18-month DOR data from the Phase 3 ENVISION trial. The 18-month DOR by Kaplan-Meier estimate for patients who achieved a CR at three months after the first instillation of Zusduri remained consistent with the 12-month DOR data: 80.6% (95% CI, 74.0%, 85.7%) at 18-months (n…
Additionally, in July 2025 we announced outcomes from the five-year long-term extension study of the single-arm, Phase 2b OPTIMA II study. Among the 41 patients who achieved CR at three months post-treatment with Zusduri in the OPTIMA II trial, 25 remained in CR at 12 months and 17 entered the long-…
In July 2026, we announced that we received a Notice of Allowance from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for a new U.S. patent covering methods of treating recurrent low-grade intermediate risk NMIBC without TURBT, supported by data from the ENVISION and ATLAS clinical trials. Once issued, the pa…
Our future research and development expenses will depend on the clinical success of our product candidates. As we continue to focus on advancing our product candidates, we expect research and development expenses to continue to be significant.
The following table sets forth our results of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-06
In March 2025, we announced 18-month DOR data from the Phase 3 ENVISION trial. The 18-month DOR by Kaplan-Meier estimate for patients who achieved a CR at three months after the first instillation of Zusduri remained consistent with the 12-month DOR data: 80.6% (95% CI, 74.0%, 85.7%) at 18-months (n…
In August 2025, we announced 24-month DOR data from the Phase 3 ENVISION trial. The 24-month DOR by Kaplan-Meier estimate for patients who achieved a CR at three months after the first instillation of Zusduri was 72.2% (95% CI, 64.1%, 78.8%). Median follow-up time was 23.7 months after the three-mon…
Additionally, in July 2025 we announced outcomes from the five-year long-term extension study of the single-arm, Phase 2b OPTIMA II study. Among the 41 patients who achieved CR at three months post-treatment with Zusduri in the OPTIMA II trial, 25 remained in CR at 12 months and 17 entered the long-…
We are currently focused on advancing our product candidates, and our future research and development expenses will depend on their clinical success. Research and development expenses will continue to be significant.
Comparison of the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025
Legal proceedings
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-05
On April 2, 2024, we filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware against Teva Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. (together with Teva Pharmaceuticals, Inc., "Teva"), and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd., alleging infringement of U.S. Patent Numbers 9…
On June 2, 2026, we entered into a settlement and license agreement (the “Agreement”) with Teva, resolving this litigation. Under the Agreement, we have agreed to grant Teva a non-exclusive license to sell its generic version of Jelmyto beginning on September 15, 2030, if approved by the FDA, unless…
On June 3, 2026, the court granted the parties’ Stipulated Dismissal Order, dismissing and closing the civil action. As required by law, the parties submitted the Agreement to the U.S. Federal Trade Commission and U.S. Department of Justice for review.
From time to time, we may be involved in various claims and legal proceedings relating to claims arising out of our operations. We are not currently a party to any material legal proceedings. Regardless of outcome, litigation can have an adverse impact on us because of defense and settlement costs, …
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-06
On April 2, 2024, the Company filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware against Teva Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd., alleging infringement of U.S. Patent Numbers 9,040,074 and 9,950,069 and seeking a perma…
From time to time, we may be involved in various claims and legal proceedings relating to claims arising out of our operations. Other than as set forth above, we are not currently a party to any material legal proceedings. Regardless of outcome, litigation can have an adverse impact on us because of…
Risk factors
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-05
Our indebtedness resulting from our loan agreement with Pharmakon Advisors, L.P. ("Pharmakon") could adversely affect our financial condition or restrict our future operations.
Our projections of both the number of people who have the cancers we are targeting, as well as the subset of people with these cancers who have previously failed prior treatments, and who have the potential to benefit from treatment with our product candidates, are based on our beliefs and estimates…
Pursuant to our April 2026 supply agreement with TAPI NL B.V. ("TAPI"), we agreed to purchase from TAPI a specified, significant percentage of our commercial requirements for the mitomycin needed for our commercial products. If TAPI is unwilling or unable to supply us with our commercial requirement…
We seek patent protection for our approved products, product candidates, and proprietary technologies. We rely on a broad collection of intellectual property comprised of owned, co-owned, and in-licensed patents, patent applications, trade secrets, know-how, and trademarks. covering our proprietary …
We expect current and future legislation affecting the healthcare industry, including healthcare reform, to impact our business generally and to increase limitations on reimbursement, rebates and other payments, which could adversely affect third-party coverage of our products, our operations, and/o…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-06
Our indebtedness resulting from our loan agreement with Pharmakon Advisors, L.P. ("Pharmakon") could adversely affect our financial condition or restrict our future operations.
If the FDA concludes that the requirements for our relevant product candidates are not as we expect, the approval pathway for these product candidates will likely take significantly longer, cost significantly more and entail significantly greater complications and risks than anticipated, and in eith…
Our projections of both the number of people who have the cancers we are targeting, as well as the subset of people with these cancers who have previously failed prior treatments, and who have the potential to benefit from treatment with our product candidates, are based on our beliefs and estimates…
the FDA’s determination that the Section 505(b)(2) of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act ("FDCA") regulatory pathway (“505(b)(2)”) is available for our product candidates;
We seek patent protection for our product candidates, and we hold a broad collection of intellectual property comprised of issued patents, in-licensed patents, pending patent applications, trade secrets and trademarks covering our proprietary RTGel technology, the pharmaceutical compositions, method…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice