UTMD — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of UTMD's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-12 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-12
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +77 | −60 | ~3 | 2 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 0 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
| Risk factors | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-12
Consolidated total 2Q 2026 revenues were $1,424 (14.3%) lower than in 2Q 2025, with 1H 2026 revenues $2,411 (12.3%) lower than in 1H 2025. The lower sales in comparison with the prior year’s periods were primarily the result of a lack of sales to UTMD’s two previously largest customers, representing…
UTMD’s profit margins compared to those of the prior year’s same periods follow:
Despite a more favorable sales mix relative to 2Q 2025, UTMD’s Gross Profit margin in 2Q 2026 contracted somewhat as a result of lower sales than expected without proportionally lowering consolidated manufacturing overhead costs. Operating Income declined more than the Gross Profit decline due to $2…
UTMD’s June 30, 2026 Balance Sheet continued strong, with no debt. Ending Cash and Investments were $87.5 million compared to $85.8 million on December 31, 2025, after paying $2.0 million in cash dividends to stockholders, repurchasing $0.2 million of UTMD common stock, increasing non-cash working c…
Foreign currency exchange (FX) rates for Balance Sheet purposes are the applicable rates at the end of each reporting period. The FX rates from the applicable foreign currency to USD for assets and liabilities at the end of 2Q 2026 compared to the end of calendar year 2025 and the end of 2Q 2025 wer…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-12
Consolidated sales in 1Q 2026 were $987 lower than in 1Q 2025. As expected and previously reported, UTMD did not have any 1Q 2026 sales to its previous largest medical device distributor of blood pressure monitoring kits in China, or to its previous OEM customer, PendoTECH. The combined sales to tho…
Using the same foreign currency exchange (FX) rates for sales not invoiced in USD, i.e. in “constant currency” terms, OUS sales would have been an additional $169 lower because of a weaker USD. FX rates for income statement purposes are transaction-weighted averages.
The average FX rates from the applicable foreign currency to USD during 1Q 2026 and 1Q 2025 follow:
UTMD’s 1Q 2026 Gross Profit at $5,282 was $256 lower than 1Q 2025 Gross Profit of $5,538. The 4.6% lower Gross Profit was less than the 10.2% decline in sales as a result of a more favorable product mix and a yearly one-time adjustment to standard costs which increased inventory value. Historically,…
average GPM. Although manufacturing overhead costs were higher, which should lower the GPM when sales are lower, UTMD continues to effectively manage its variable manufacturing expenses.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice